Apparently we need to "get our heads out of our asses"...
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (381)
sorted by:
This is basic (granted, archaic) MSM bullshit - the New Testament. So while we get one story on Fox, another on CNN, another on OANN and another from internet journos/anons - what does one do? Believe all four as “gospel”? Believe just one and make it our own narrative based on feelings?
I’m sure you know the answer - take each with a grain of salt and apply critical thinking to any common threads, right?
So I do believe christs story and words - but I don’t hinge on just one specific quote as the crux of what I believe, and I find a lot of people do (the John quote above perhaps for example). As with the msm narrative, is the picking and choosing that quote based on feelings? What do the other gospels say in their version of those quotes? What is the common thread among the “editorializing”, if you will?
I believe Christ is “a” way, perhaps the most simple/effective way, but not the only way however.
Again, no qualms with Christ, no qualms with the Bible, but I do take issue with fundamentalists - again, cuz they’re effectively liberals. In the MSM example, fundamentalists are the sheep that keep the great lie moving and thus many from finding the truth. And about as equally annoying to deal with due to the massive ego involved.
You have qualms with Christ stating that he is the way, the truth and the life in John 14:6.
You have qualms with the Bible in that you contend that it can't be taken at face value (OT, NT and/or Gospels).
New Testament literally must be taken with a grain of salt purely due to the fact it was pieces together by what were effectively “deep state” politicians.
The gospels are the part that is most important and can be taken with less salt because there is so much more corroboration. However, you’re stuck on John - but go look what the others say he said.
Again, like liberals - instead of “trust the science” and backing fauci, you’re choosing Johns word over the other three combined and contrasted. But hey, to be fair, as with liberals, if you questioned things and applied critical thinking and objectivity then your narrative bubble would collapse.
I’m still waiting on the explanation for Revelations explicitly mentioning that it applies to their generations and their time (at the time of writing) as well as waiting on you to read the other gospels.
Funny thing is you’re possibly feeling smug and such when posting your quotes (again, liberal …). Ultimately you do you tho, by default you are on the right team and that’s all that matters.