It would be news of Twitter didn't ban someone for calling Disney groomers. They are covering for one of their own.

Just so no one forgets (not that anyone on this forum ever would), Twitter banned Trump and is quick to ban anyone for mis-gendering some one. However, they seem to have a problem with banning child porn. And this is no accident, if you see what the ban and fail to ban as a whole, it becomes very clear what they are about. Here is one of many articles about this:

https://nypost.com/2021/01/22/twitters-policing-problem/

And even though this articles seems to be nicer to when talking about twitter than it deserves (so you can forward it to normies), you still get interesting quotes like:

According to a federal lawsuit filed this week in California, Twitter took more than a month, refusing countless pleas along the way, to remove widely viewed images and videos of a teen sex-trafficking victim. The suit, filed by the victim and his mom, accuses Twitter of making money off the child-porn clips, which the victim says traffickers blackmailed him into making when he was 13. One even included a second child, yet when the clips showed up on Twitter in 2019, the company refused to remove them, saying it “didn’t find a violation” of its “policies.”

To repeat: Child porn is not a violation of twitter policy. But mis-gendering or calling out a groomer is.

Also, if you must have links to twitter, replace twitter.com with nitter.net. Nitter helps to minimize twitter's ability to track you and make money off it. It's also supposed to be faster and more secure.