So, this is the FBI we are supposed to trust? - The Great Awakening

So, this is the FBI we are supposed to trust? (www.washingtontimes.com)

posted 2 years ago by Oldgal_frdup 2 years ago by Oldgal_frdup +37 / -0

21 comments

21 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (21)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– mac1221 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I am just going to throw this out there for consideration. When stories start hitting MSM after years of suppression, I have to ask myself the question, why now? Why are stories coming out lately about the corruption of Federal law enforcement when it has been there for years? Who gains by publicly casting doubt on the credibility of law enforcement? Is all this water being muddied to bring reasonable doubt upon current or future investigations? Is this an angle? If so, then the merits of a cause of action are obfuscated in legal technicality and the public hype surrounding the veracity of a particular investigation(s). Is this then a well planned escape hatch?

I am simply curious if anyone else is thinking along these lines or is it just overactive cynicism.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Oldgal_frdup [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I think your instincts are spot on. They are trying to get in front of it to as you say muddy the waters and try to control the narrative.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– mac1221 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I agree. These people never release stories without a purpose. It is never about actually reporting the news.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q