Sign In or Create an Account
The Chinese will not take on the US in a frontal attack. They have telegraphed years ago exactly how they were going to defeat us - from within. All they need to do is sit back and watch us implode.
I use blue blocking glasses when on computers, phone, and tablets - anything with a digital screen.
This was exactly my thoughts as well. Thanks for the confirmation.
Excellent breakdown fren and I concur with your assessment. Yes, something as simple as sunlight is not profitable for those wanting to sell some fix in a bottle.
@smartbaum sums it all up pretty well. Methylation is a poorly understood process and it seems that alternative health practitioners are just now jumping on the bandwagon seemingly without understanding the underlying science - just as our fellow anon has stated. Supplements alone cannot fix some of these underlying problems with mitochondrial dysfunction. Once again, light and other frequencies can have healthful or deleterious effects on how the body functions. It is hard to make money on sunlight. Thanks
Can't go wrong there. Everyone needs them. Our modern American society is woefully lacking these important foods in our diets - so they have to come from somewhere.
You are welcome. Yes, decay in both children and adults can reek havoc on the body - not only by severely stressing the immune system, but also creating the environment that allows more pathogenic bacteria to thrive all through the digestive tract. Sugar and other carbs create an acidic environment that favors populations not conducive to health including yeast. What people also do not understand is that when the gut flora becomes altered, it will not revert to healthy population levels unless it is forced to do so by the introduction of healthier strains and dietary changes. They don't make themselves out of thin air and it is a two pronged approach. Not only does there need to be a constant source of good bugs, but the conditions also need to be in place that favor a healthy environment for them to thrive.
The acids produced by carbs, especially simple sugars, leach the minerals out of a tooth making it weak thereby leading to breakdown - decay. The acids produced by the decay itself in return keeps the cycle going. Children's teeth are not only smaller, but the surface enamel is not completely calcified when they are born and can easily be damaged. I saw my far share of bottle mouth in my twenty some years of practice.
DoTerra makes a toothpaste that contains hydroxyapatite. That is the natural mineral complex of calcified tissue in the body. The key is to use it like medicine and not a cleaner. Brush the teeth with a small amount of baking soda to neutralize acids or just use a damp toothbrush. People need to get over the conditioning that they have to use toothpaste to clean their teeth. Before going to bed, take a tiny amount of the doTerra and brush it onto the teeth. Do not rinse it off. The doTerra is safe to swallow as it does not contain any nasty chemicals. But use it sparingly. It takes about 20 minutes for the hydroxyapatite to uptake onto the enamel surface so putting it on the teeth before crawling into the rack is best since it will be undisturbed. This is also a good strategy for mouth breathers.
As a practitioner, if ever I was allowed to have some say before and during the time a woman was pregnant, I counseled them on a good diet and supplement regiment. Included in that regiment were fermented foods and probiotics. Babies guts are pretty much a blank slate when they are born and the populations of flora they will have comes from mom. Therefore, if mom is harboring unhealthy levels, chances are the baby will as well. In addition, if I had a mom that was prone to decay themselves, I got them on xylitol gum until their child was about two. The xylitol would dampen s.mutans which is a huge player in tooth decay. I knew I was dealing with altered flora in adults with perio disease as well. After years of being a clinician, you can almost tell there were huge dental problems in a patient by just looking at their face.
The gut biome is huge and I educated myself on it when the first links came out about the connections with the altered flora being linked to coronary disease back in the eighties. Needless to say, most of my colleagues poo pooed the idea.
Keep your daughter on probiotics - especially the bifida. She has already demonstrated a tendency in a bad direction and is therefore susceptible. Watch the halides. That includes chlorine from water and bromine additives in foods and beverages. Fluoride goes without saying. All these halides demolish healthy flora and also can lead to thyroid and other endocrine problems as they compete with iodine. Once there is a gluten problem, it usually does not go away. It can always be there at lower levels running in the background. That can lead to more chronic issues down the road as it is doing its job more slowly over time.
Remember that just because someone may seem to have turned the corner on an acute situation does not mean that the environment that caused the problem in the first place has been removed. The immune system has already been primed. That never really goes away and can rear its ugly head if the conditions are right. I had a friend who's daughter suffered with severe eczema and gut problems as a toddler. I sent her to one of my colleagues that treated the biome and diet problems - the daughter got better. In fact, the whole family was better with the changes. Years later when this daughter left home and went off to college, the eczema came back with a vengeance because of eating like a typical college student and the stress. Her skin was so bad that she had to leave college and come back home. It took a year to finally get her settled back down. Needless to say, my friend's daughter learned the hard way that vigilance is key.
Good luck to you.
The US is not far behind. There is over 100k headed our way right now as well.
Sad commentary on the education system that all those chumps applauded someone who fought the Soviets in the second world war. They were virtue signaling by honoring the side that fought against their own Canadian WW2 vets. Oops. Trudeau said it was Russian disinformation.
They have only actually identified a small number of critters that populate the gut. But what is amazing is that bifida appears to be a huge player. Numbers are low, or absent, in people with certain conditions. The research is showing that vaxxines appear to negatively affect bifida populations and that seems to be a factor in mental disorders, allergies, eczema, etc.
I was listening to one gal who probably the world's best expert in this particular wheelhouse and she had some interesting things to report about what she has found. Her research has been looking into the the vaxxine damage on the gut in people like kids with autism. She has actually cured some kids with autism using fecal transplants. One of the problems she is currently facing is finding healthy donors after the rollout of the Rona jab. I guess it really does a number on gut flora - especially bifida.
Of course more research is needed, but some treatments with repopulating the gut, especially in children with autism, is showing some very promising results. Andy Wakefield made the connection years ago that kids with autism had gut problems. No one listened to him. There is a link.
Do some research on b.bifidus. Vaxxines wipe out normal gut flora - especially bifidus. This wiping out of bifidus is associated with autism, dementia, bipolar, and other mental/neurological conditions as well as IBS, allergies, and eczema. Many kids with autism have gut issues. Half of the brain's neurotransmitters are in the gut as well as a huge part of the immune system. The gut is the second brain. Getting the gut healthy is a move forward in dealing with this crime. Do your homework though. Yogurt is not going to turn this around - especially the usual sugar loaded garbage sold in most stores. It is a process. Heavy metals must also be detoxed - carefully or they redistribute in the body. If you can, find an alternative provider that deals with autistic kids. Check and see what protocols and treatments they are using.
Don't apologize brother. You are honestly pouring out your heart - not only to God, but to us as well. Heavenly Father, be with this family. Guide them and strengthen them in the days that lie ahead of them. Allow them to grow stronger in their faith in You and in each other through this experience. Most of all, send healing for your child - no complications and a speedy recovery. We thank you in advance for what you are doing. In the name of Jesus, Amen.
Ballard's connections to the farm are undeniable. Until proven otherwise, once a clown, always a clown. Gee, how many times have we been told this person or that is a good guy only to find out this was not the case? I also question the funding of Angel Studios to make this movie - Carlos Slim and John Paul DeJoria. There are ties to the CIA as well as unsavory characters like the Clintons and the Bidens. The movie was made 5 years ago. Why now the release? Also, the powers that should not be do not allow things to be shown to the public unless there is a green light.
All I am saying is that if we have learned anything over the last several years is that we need to look below the surface and not take things at face value simply because there is a message that we approve of. My own research on the people behind the film leaves questions about uncomfortable connections that have not been answered to satisfaction. This is not a repudiation against the movie itself nor its content. I simply have unanswered questions about the people behind the camera and the prima facia implications of what we know so far about them.
Do your homework on Ballard. He may not be the hero everyone is making him out to be.
Hey, sometimes no "Church" is the way to go. I like the idea of the Amish model of faith. It is basic and dispenses with the all the self help psychobabble that has infected most of Modern Christianity. I don't blame you. Most places leave an impression with me of a powerless and shallow faith that is unable to stand when the heat is turned up. Professing Christ and His resurrection is the most important thing because without that, we have no faith or hope.
As far as the debate between Germ and Terrain, I do fall more to the Terrain side. You are most definitely correct that most of the history with modern medical models completely based upon Germ Theory are extremely flawed and have been corrupted for profit. On that, you will get no argument from me. I just would like to see the Terrain view moved into some real honest research with some results that can prove its assertions - one way or the other. Until then, I am sort of stuck working with the elements of Germ that do hold some weight in application. Unfortunately, when dealing with sick patients, sometimes these loftier debates at the time have no practical use. But, I do approach my treatments cognizant that Terrain is crucial if there are to be any long lasting movement towards health.
Like I already stated, I think the real answer is lying somewhere in-between these two theories - in that gray area. The conclusions of research are never that cut and dry no matter how much they try to present it as such. It always leads to more questions typically than answers if it is approached in an honest unbiased manner.
Bacteria and parasites, now those are critters that can make some people really sick. Hell, you can see them with the naked eye or under a microscope. I have even grown a few of them in the lab. But, viruses? Now that is a topic that never set well with me - even in college. Everything that has sprang out of the idea of no-see-ums that are out there making us sick always appeared very weak to me and I never have bought into it. That is one of the main reasons I was never a vaxxine pusher. I can't even begin to tell you how the entire sham built up around the rationale for treating something that seems completely contrived is just plain wrong. All of it flies right in the face of common sense biology. In fact, the entire medical model temple needs to be burnt to the ground and rebuilt with new ideas and new minds.
But as I also stated, this is not a debate between either approach as the end all to be all. I just do not think it is that polarized based upon my own experience as a clinician and a researcher for several decades. I have no qualms about chucking prior paradigms in exchange for newer ways of thinking that can demonstrate validity.
Thank you again for taking the time to respond. Have a great rest of your day and an awesome weekend.
Numbers are significant to cultists and the religion is ancient as you state. 9 and 11 are especially meaningful to them. I also realize that many things are hijacked by them and twisted. That being said, I respectfully disagree that this event is one of them.
We can agree to disagree... but resorting to attacking me personally is counterproductive to discussion and is not a good look for those that may be lurking here seeking information. We are supposed to be better than that.
The simple answer to your question is no. Graphene is carbon. If it were a compound made of other elements, then possibly it could be broken down into smaller constituents and then those elements could possibly be removed. This is a fairly new challenge at trying to find out what may work at removing graphene from the body through normal elimination pathways. But honestly, I have seen nothing as of yet beyond speculative suggestions.
The brain however, does present a significant challenge for removing anything that makes its way past the blood brain barrier. The most promising therapy at the moment, IMHO, is EDTA chelation therapy probably in addition to therapy modalities that force graphene out of tissue and into the bloodstream to be removed. If the graphene is not removed at that point, like when trying to remove heavy metals, it will simply redistribute throughout the body causing other problems.
Graphene also is very stable - that is why industry uses it. It is nearly indestructible and it has electrical properties. The question for us is why is there graphene present in the jabs? Is it contamination from the manufacturing process, or is it deliberately placed there? We don't know for sure at this point - again, speculation.
FYI: Graphene is also being utilized in filters for municipal water treatment facilities. Is that graphene being taken out of the finished product? We may have graphene in the water supply. Reclaimed water is then used to water agriculture and many city parks. Something to consider.
Sorry I could not be more helpful. This is worrisome to say the least because this crap is ending up in everything and is quickly becoming ubiquitous.
Here you go. There is great discussion here arguing for the 4BCE date of Herod's death in great detail and the article takes Martin on directly and others that promote a date of 1BCE date and exactly where their arguments are flawed. Therefore, this debate is not as settled as you claim. In addition, I have not derived my conclusions on my own by "cherry picking" certain scriptures. It comes from years of academic study and reading source documents - in their original languages.
WHEN DID HEROD THE GREAT DIE? PART 1
WHEN DID HEROD THE GREAT DIE? PART 2
That whole discussion at times seems to me as another distraction. I truly believe that the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Right now Terrain is for the most part, well sounding speculation with little clinical proof. That is not the fault of people promoting this idea - it takes money to do proper research. Therefore, I am not finding fault. But, until I can see more substantial practical bench proven and reproducible science, it remains for me some very intriguing observation that warrant serious study because some of what is presented as fact in Germ Theory is crap. For example, there are some not well known studies that indicate that the premise of disease transmission is flawed. It still needs further investigation. But, that does not mean the baby is thrown out with the bathwater.
If I know anything after years of working in clinical research, it is hardly ever an either or proposition, one way or that way. Our world is more nuanced than simple black and white issues - especially the human body. The only black and white proposition in life is that you are either dead or you are alive - and even those definitions are being screwed with. Everything else is a shade of grey. Picking sides between this or that is not getting to the truth and it is not science; which is more a process of synthesis of empirical data and deriving at conclusions that are not preconceived and biased. Unfortunately, this type of science is rare and more than once got me in trouble. The problem with taking positions is that over time it becomes more an exercise in being right rather than a search for answers to scientific questions. The answers to real scientific inquiry can and do change over time and real science is not deterred by challenges to long held ideas. Power, money, agendas, and egos however, are unwilling and unable to change - no matter which side of a debate is chosen.
Just as a side note that is germane to our previous discussion, Cowen and company also have some questionable affiliations that I am still investigating along the lines of a new age theosophy bent. This spider web of connections is massive - as is the deception of spun lies that infiltrate almost every aspect of our lives. It is hard to find any clarity in any of it - that too is deliberate.
I will bring it back to my original challenge. You still must deal with Herod and his death which also is well sourced and fairly fixed in order for your hypothesis to stand.
You obviously missed the whole point. But like I said, that is okay. Continue on.
I remember that when it all went down. The FDA also raided the company in Paris that was making the GcMAF. What jurisdiction does our FDA have in France? They systematically shut down the entire manufacturing, distribution, and use of this product as well as the providers that used it. It also sent a huge message to anyone else from even looking into it. As a clinician, it was a huge blow and a wakeup call as to how serious these bastards are at protecting their turf. I have many colleagues in alternative medicine and these events sent some major shockwaves through the community. May they all rest in peace. This is war and it has been war for many years - even centuries. Sadly, most of the public has not realized it. Thanks again for your replies. It is always nice to have intelligent discussion with another - a thing which seems to be getting more rare these days.
Look into the Lucas Trust and its links to new age, theosophy, and Luciferianism. That my friend, is the one world religion. It permeates just about all levels of governments and many religions - even Christianity.
Okay, don't answer the challenge made to your particular hypothesis. Taking it in another direction to obfuscate the challenge still does not take care of the discrepancy. What you present has nothing to do with the points I was offering for consideration.
Unfortunately, it is not as air tight as you think. There has been more than one attempt to use astronomical dating to pinpoint this event. ALL OF THEM arrive at different dating because this software is based upon dating that is flawed to begin with due to the discrepancies in ancient calendars and dating methods. I have seen just about all of them. But that is okay. We can agree to disagree. But unless a hypothesis harmonizes with the rest of the information concerning that event in a textural, historical, and cultural context, it must be held loosely - not as fact.
The important thing is that we are all believers and that is what we have in common and we should not argue about things that cannot be nailed down with any decree of certainty. It was never meant to be. If his birth was to align with a Hebrew festival date, there would be an indication of that in the text. There is none. Therefore, take what we do know for certain - his death and resurrection - and hold to that.
Most reliable scholarship has the date of Herod's death as in 4BCE. However, there are some less accepted dating that places it in 1BCE but this in an outlier. The text also states that when the Magi came, they found "the child" with his mother in "the house" meaning, that they came to see not an infant in a manger. By the time the Magi came, the family were already settled in the city. It is important that people separate their traditions from the clear reading of the text.
People seem to forget that in the ancient world travel took time. It took time for the Magi to travel from the East when they saw his star and to finally reach Jerusalem - a process that from start to finish took several months. Their first visit would naturally be to the capital to inquire on the birth of a new king. This would have been after his birth by several months. It also took time for them to find him. Herod would have waited for the Magi to find him rather than stir the people up. When Herod had found out the Magi had left without telling him, Herod was enraged. When the angel came to Joseph to warn the family to leave because of Herod, this process had taken months. Therefore, Jesus was already a small toddler when they had the visit from the Magi and then escaped to Egypt. The gifts of the Magi paid their way. Herod died when the family was in Egypt. Therefore, placing his birth in 3BCE does not fit.
Agreed. In fact, his birth was probably on the new moon of Nisan - which is a significant point on the Hebrew calendar as it fixes not only the month, but starts the rest of the religious calendar cycle. Every major event in his life aligns on that calendar - his death, resurrection, the giving of the Holy Spirit and most likely his return. So, why would not his birth also line up with the same calendar. In addition, his birth was prior to the death of Herod the Great who, according to most scholarship, died in 4BCE. Therefore, the above posted dating is in error. That major fact was absent from the details listed. Another fact is that when the Magi came, they found "the child" in the "house." They came to see a child and not an infant in a manger. The Greek is specific in that this is speaking of a small child and not a baby. Guess people will have to rethink their manger scenes.