BREAKING; Here’s the NY TERRORIST:
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
What?
What about "innocent until proven guilty"? How many times have we seen immediate release of names and faces, only for that information to be wrong?
I'm not saying he didn't do it, and that he isn't involved, but if he's just a person of interest - meaning that he hasn't even been arrested yet - then they shouldn't have revealed anything about him, particularly with the state of today's social landscape. If he's innocent, then this incident has made him guilty in the eyes of the public, no matter what comes of this. Everyone should know this, if they'd paid attention to what happens whenever the media fixates on anyone.
He’s at large. They have to release his face and name in order to capture him though.
That's not what's being reported. It's being reported that he's a person of interest, not that there's a warrant out for his arrest.
Apprehend, arrest, or interview...He needs to be found and this is how it’s done. Sorry.
That's fine and all. I suppose my original sticking point was that you announced him as the New York Terrorist, which goes directly into what I'm saying. He may be guilty, or he may be innocent, but in going about this manner, if he is innocent, then he's still going to be "guilty". Just like Rittenhouse was "guilty", and Sandmann, and Trump. The media have declared him guilty already, and it's already being played to as though that's the truth.
He a gud boy, a gentle giant, he dindu nuffin (it’s an old joke, Michael Brown, George Floyd, etc…