Brian Cates (Draw and Strike) via Tel:
If Stew Peters and "Dr." Bryan Ardis had done any real testing, if they'd subjected the "poisoned by snake venom in the water" hypothesis to any standard of medical or scientific scrutiny, they would've never advanced some of the claims they made in "Watch The Water".
Ardis has now already turned on Stew Peters, claiming he was taken out of context or had a speculation blown up into the main point of the video.
This is why you have to be careful who you grant -or are told to grant - authority figure status.
Either through sheer incompetence or in a hurry to get clicks and rake in $$$ from a new supplement line, nobody seems to have stopped and tested the speculations and theories first before putting them out there in a hyped-to-the-moon video that ended up confusing a lot of people.
The fact Ardis was already backing off his venom in the water supply claims the very next day in an interview with Ann Vandersteel tells you how stable these claims are.
But if my asking hard questions and covering this makes you uncomfortable, let me go on the record here:
I
DON'T
CARE.
(source: https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/38137)
Ardis stated that one possibility was artificially created short segments created from studies of snake venom - that is a hypothesis that deserves serious consideration. Already serious anon biochemists confirm that there are segments of analogues to segments of venom, such as the posts by Jikky on twitter/nitter. Jikky notes that this is not in the vaccine but is the result of how mRNA hijacks the immune system to create spike proteins, which have segments in them that entirely mimic venom. Cates' background is not biological science so I can understand how controversy appears to wholly disprove a hypothesis. But it is clear that Ardis is on to something the science already shows us:
https://nitter.net/Jikkyleaks