It’s time for Pragmatism. Watch with an open mind for best results.
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
What this guy is saying is basic diplomacy, and he's totally correct.
If there is one lesson I've learned the hard way in life, it's this :- the more certain you are that you are right, the more likely it is that you are wrong.
You have to question everything sometimes, including your own core beliefs. If you ignored everyone who might say something you disagree with, or who turns out to be wrong occassionally, then you could end up ignoring yourself :)
to close yourself off to information simply because the source isnt the most agreeable to our liking, is to remain willfully ignorant of potentially valuable information. too many big names have instructed their followers to stay far away from Steinbart, which for me personally only strengthened my curiosity.
unity, not division, is the only way forward. even if we dont agree 100% on everything, we all have a common goal.
good. there is much more material to come from him, on top of what hes already put out over the years. he is heavily censored and suppressed, including being thrown in prison for a year by the FBI for something really really petty. he is over the target, at least in my opinion.
I know most people here will reflexively disagree with this man because of various reasons. Listen to his message. See if you truly disagree.
the problem is not the message. our movement has always meant unity not uniformity.
the problem is Austin Steinbart fraudulently poses as Q, and ropes people in -- particularly those who came later to the drops and find them dense and hard to interpret. Austin Steinbart in not Q, and has nothing to do with Q.
if Steinbart has something valuable to contribute on a public platform, why would he need to engineer a mystique about his identity?
Q is about the message, not the message maker. we are mostly anon for a reason.
hes the only person that hasn't engineered his identity. he has fully doxxed himself and his family, and their history. Anybody can verify whether he is being truthful in that regard. can any other q influencers say the same?
you say he has nothing to do with Q, but thats indicative to me you haven't looked into his material, in the least bit. Do you always take such a strong position on topics which you haven't looked in to? why?
the anon aspect of the mission is over. the drops are over. anonymous chat boards have reached their maximum potential for garnering support. in order to continue building the movement, it needs a face and a name. do you really think youre going to convince any lefties with anonymous posts from evil racist Chan boards? or are they more likely to be partial to you if you can point them in the direction of a real, accountable person? do you think we can complete this mission without their support? what is overwhelming democratic mandate? why is this necessary to achieve?