Changing what Q actually said to back up your belief/claim is a bold method. Nearly as bold as libs going "what the founders ACTUALLY meant was 'x' and therefore the 1st and 2nd amendments are invalid and abortion is a right so I was correct all along!".
Changing what Q actually said to back up your belief/claim is a bold method. Nearly as bold as libs going "what the founders ACTUALLY meant was 'x' and therefore the 1st and 2nd amendments are invalid and abortion is a right so I was correct all along!".
I agree with you on this Spaceman. That seems like confirmation bias at its finest.
Not changing what Q said, what do you think "we control" means?