It's not his own writing I find issue with. It's insinuating that he somehow decided to get this evidence into the hands of authorities by turning it over to a repair shop. Who then did what? Turned it over to the FBI who then did what? They lost it. The only reason this information got out was because the repair guy made multiple backups of the hard drive before physically turning it over to the authorities. There is nothing in his writings that makes him some kind of "hero" by turning over evidence to any authorities. Thats pure conjecture with zero evidence.
It's his own writing. What should I do with this? In what way is posting this doing what you say here?
It's not his own writing I find issue with. It's insinuating that he somehow decided to get this evidence into the hands of authorities by turning it over to a repair shop. Who then did what? Turned it over to the FBI who then did what? They lost it. The only reason this information got out was because the repair guy made multiple backups of the hard drive before physically turning it over to the authorities. There is nothing in his writings that makes him some kind of "hero" by turning over evidence to any authorities. Thats pure conjecture with zero evidence.