I thought devolution is the continuous process of legitimate government when there is a hostile take over of the country.
Meaning that anyone who believes in devolution, believes that the Trump government is still in charge under the shadow of a hostile government.
So maybe I'm confused by your last sentence, or maybe I'm just confused in general.
I know. I'm with you in it's confusion. Under that situation that wouldn't be a bad thing but I'm quite sure the devolution god Mr Patel Patriot said Trump would be powerless.
No just no. You people need to stop climaxing on the word devolution.
If Trump is still Commander in Chief, which he is, there is no devolution.
I thought devolution is the continuous process of legitimate government when there is a hostile take over of the country. Meaning that anyone who believes in devolution, believes that the Trump government is still in charge under the shadow of a hostile government.
So maybe I'm confused by your last sentence, or maybe I'm just confused in general.
I know. I'm with you in it's confusion. Under that situation that wouldn't be a bad thing but I'm quite sure the devolution god Mr Patel Patriot said Trump would be powerless.
Maybe someone else can weigh in.
I thought the point of devolution was to retain power. Interesting.