What I don't understand is why they used the DNC hack lie. JA was always going to be a danger to the whole thing.

Now Durham is going around building connections (the spiderweb) between all of them. He forced Mark Elias (Fusion GPS connection) to testify which means he successful broke attorney-client privilege. That's a huge barrier to break.

They're desperate to stop it. This move is panic:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump%20suit%20against%20clinton%20could%20sustain%20secrecy%20on%20origins%20of%20dossier/ar-AAWomvC

Lawyers for private investigation firm Fusion GPS argued in court filings released Tuesday that Trump’s newly filed racketeering suit bolsters their effort to conceal specifics of the firm’s work with the 2016 Clinton campaign via attorney-client privilege. Trump and his allies have long targeted Fusion, which commissioned the controversial Steele Dossier making salacious and at times unsupported allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia.

And look at the idiots doing the hard work of wiring themselves to Durham's bomb:

In a court filing in connection with the criminal prosecution of one of Elias’ former colleagues, Michael Sussmann, for allegedly lying to the FBI, Elias contends that Fusion played a role in his effort to guard the Clinton camp and the DNC from a litigious adversary — Trump — as they prepared to unleash a fusillade of attacks about his business record and foreign entanglements.

They are now intervening in Sussman's case to try and stop it from connecting to them. They are trying to keep themselves from connecting by... connecting themselves and arguing that Sussman's matter affects their legal matters.

On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted, “Donald Trump has a secret server ... It was set up to communicate privately with a Putin-tied Russian bank.”

Clinton later tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”

(We now know who those computer scientists were. Ask Joffe and his Georgia Tech scientists).

Interestingly, Comey reopens the investigation into Clinton on October 28th, 2016.

https://greatawakening.win/p/15HIOlCvNh/one-theory-why-q-chose-october-2/c/

HRC was in the air at 30,000 feet when at 1:04 pm on October 28th, when Comey's letter lands. HRC still says she is traumatized by "October 28th, 2016".

One year later, Q drops the first post on October 28th, 2017.

Sussmann’s lawyers argued the Clinton tweet sharing Sullivan’s statement and touting the story, which originally appeared in Slate, should be considered “inadmissible” for two “fundamental” reasons.

Sussman's lawyers wrote, “The Tweet, which was posted on October 31, 2016, does not reveal anything about Mr. Sussmann’s state of mind over a month earlier, when he purportedly made the alleged false statement.

“There is no evidence that Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with Mr. Baker had anything to do with the Clinton Campaign’s broader media strategy.”

This is what they're fighting:

Sussmann’s lawyers countered, “There is a real danger that if the Tweet were admitted, the jury would believe that Hillary Clinton herself was part of the Special Counsel’s uncharged conspiracy and that she had a direct interest or involvement in Mr. Sussmann’s efforts. Drawing the candidate herself into this matter in this way would be unfair to Mr. Sussmann.”

No, don't draw HRC into this. If she gets drawn into, then think of all the other people she could pull in with her. They CAN'T allow that.

Guess that October 31st, 2016 tweet by Hillary is going to boomerang back. Tweeting that was really, really stupid.

Look at them scrambling to say there is no connection. Don't connect us. You can't! REEEEEE.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/sussmann-doesnt-want-clinton-tweet-touting-collusion-claims-to-be-admissible