When he reviled that the board collectively owned 77 shares of Twitter and turned downs is 54.20 per share shows they don't care about profit, or there fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. He's exposed them for what they are a US Government backed psyop not an actual business. If he offered $542.00 a share they would turn it down! The "board" has zero financial stake in the company.
It's far worse than propaganda mate, it's a responsive learning system designed to start and stop wars and memory hole whatever it likes. The simple state of observing what key words get likes and loves and what gets angry faces and thumbs down etc is profoundly dangerous.
Start censoring things that get loves and likes, promote content that gets angry faces in Egypt and Whoa! Whaddya know? A civil war!
When he reviled that the board collectively owned 77 shares of Twitter and turned downs is 54.20 per share shows they don't care about profit, or there fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. He's exposed them for what they are a US Government backed psyop not an actual business. If he offered $542.00 a share they would turn it down! The "board" has zero financial stake in the company.
It's far worse than propaganda mate, it's a responsive learning system designed to start and stop wars and memory hole whatever it likes. The simple state of observing what key words get likes and loves and what gets angry faces and thumbs down etc is profoundly dangerous.
Start censoring things that get loves and likes, promote content that gets angry faces in Egypt and Whoa! Whaddya know? A civil war!