When he reviled that the board collectively owned 77 shares of Twitter and turned downs is 54.20 per share shows they don't care about profit, or there fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. He's exposed them for what they are a US Government backed psyop not an actual business. If he offered $542.00 a share they would turn it down! The "board" has zero financial stake in the company.
It's far worse than propaganda mate, it's a responsive learning system designed to start and stop wars and memory hole whatever it likes. The simple state of observing what key words get likes and loves and what gets angry faces and thumbs down etc is profoundly dangerous.
Start censoring things that get loves and likes, promote content that gets angry faces in Egypt and Whoa! Whaddya know? A civil war!
People aren't understanding the board thing at all.
Most companies have different kinds of boards or directors. The ones on twitter that own basically none of it were incorrectly labeled "the board." They are actually a board of advisors. Look up their names individually, they are not actual "Board" members, they're just key advisers that talk to the executive team - it's an honorary position and they typically aren't paid or rewarded.
Twitter board members are paid a collective 3M a year, but the real power of the board comes from their members sitting on other corporate boards, directling policy to their mutal benefit. All the boards of major corporations have interlocking directerories with other big media, finance, pharma, miliary/aerospace, etc, creating a seemingly impenetrable 5th column of corporate rulers, beholden to one, that lie and censor for their own greed and social interests. This is the Deep State. Years back, there was great site where you could input almost any large corporation and see a graph of who sits on who whose board. I would love to see what network of boards the Twitter board members also sit on. No doubt, Pfizer has a seat at the table, but who else? This site has some old examples, but, unfortuneately, all the links to the old sites I tried are dead.
If by "an underground of workers making policy", you mean corporate board directors, than yes, though they're not underground, and calling them "workers" sounds funny, though a job is a job. How do you think power has been consolidated in the last few decades? How do you figure we went from having dozens of media outlets 30 years ago to having six today? And how the same has been achieved in almost every other industry? You don't see why this is necessary for totalitarian control of a population? WEF promotes the idea that you'll live in a pod, eat bugs, own nothing and be happy, but you"ll get your pod from Home Depot, your bugs from Monsanto, financed by Citibank. Choice doesn't have a place in the dystopia they want for you. The deep state is an unelected, unaccountable body of financial, political and social control, and these incestuous, interlocking directorates certainly fit the bill.
When he reviled that the board collectively owned 77 shares of Twitter and turned downs is 54.20 per share shows they don't care about profit, or there fiduciary responsibility to the share holders. He's exposed them for what they are a US Government backed psyop not an actual business. If he offered $542.00 a share they would turn it down! The "board" has zero financial stake in the company.
Lifelog - you misspelled FaceBook…. Oh I see what you did there.
Please report to the CIA’s office of reeeeeducation for further help.
It's far worse than propaganda mate, it's a responsive learning system designed to start and stop wars and memory hole whatever it likes. The simple state of observing what key words get likes and loves and what gets angry faces and thumbs down etc is profoundly dangerous.
Start censoring things that get loves and likes, promote content that gets angry faces in Egypt and Whoa! Whaddya know? A civil war!
that was a powerful disclosure. shareholders will be pissed if board doesn't accept the offer
DeSantis has threatened to sue.
People aren't understanding the board thing at all.
Most companies have different kinds of boards or directors. The ones on twitter that own basically none of it were incorrectly labeled "the board." They are actually a board of advisors. Look up their names individually, they are not actual "Board" members, they're just key advisers that talk to the executive team - it's an honorary position and they typically aren't paid or rewarded.
Twitter board members are paid a collective 3M a year, but the real power of the board comes from their members sitting on other corporate boards, directling policy to their mutal benefit. All the boards of major corporations have interlocking directerories with other big media, finance, pharma, miliary/aerospace, etc, creating a seemingly impenetrable 5th column of corporate rulers, beholden to one, that lie and censor for their own greed and social interests. This is the Deep State. Years back, there was great site where you could input almost any large corporation and see a graph of who sits on who whose board. I would love to see what network of boards the Twitter board members also sit on. No doubt, Pfizer has a seat at the table, but who else? This site has some old examples, but, unfortuneately, all the links to the old sites I tried are dead.
So now the deep state is companies and not an underground of workers who have been making policy for decades?
If by "an underground of workers making policy", you mean corporate board directors, than yes, though they're not underground, and calling them "workers" sounds funny, though a job is a job. How do you think power has been consolidated in the last few decades? How do you figure we went from having dozens of media outlets 30 years ago to having six today? And how the same has been achieved in almost every other industry? You don't see why this is necessary for totalitarian control of a population? WEF promotes the idea that you'll live in a pod, eat bugs, own nothing and be happy, but you"ll get your pod from Home Depot, your bugs from Monsanto, financed by Citibank. Choice doesn't have a place in the dystopia they want for you. The deep state is an unelected, unaccountable body of financial, political and social control, and these incestuous, interlocking directorates certainly fit the bill.