That’s what I thought, but Walgreens breaks out the tests given by vax status as well and 27% were unvaxxed so I suspect the unvaxxed are over-represented in this data.
Besides, this is “rates of positivity” so it’s automatically adjusted for differing numbers of people per cohort.
You might argue that vaxxed are more likely to get tested when feeling sick, but then you have to wonder why did 90% of the unvaxxed go get tested?
I think this data is pretty clear: the vaxxed are getting sick more readily than the unvaxxed. This is ADE or negative efficacy (same thing).
That’s what I thought, but Walgreens breaks out the tests given by vax status as well and 27% were unvaxxed so I suspect the unvaxxed are over-represented in this data.
Besides, this is “rates of positivity” so it’s automatically adjusted for differing numbers of people per cohort.
You might argue that vaxxed are more likely to get tested when feeling sick, but then you have to wonder why did 90% of the unvaxxed go get tested?
I think this data is pretty clear: the vaxxed are getting sick more readily than the unvaxxed. This is ADE or negative efficacy (same thing).