Another example is the Depp vs Heard shit. The theorists are claiming Depp has bot farms to spam shit against amber heard. Both are deep staters but this is obviously something used to demoralize young men. If this rich guy Depp can’t defend himself against an abusive woman, what can I do?
Russell brand and the “Gop is plotting to steal the election and kill us all” narrative are examples of conspiracy theories/theorists that have become even more popular. They say enough to get people talking but not enough to reveal the real truth. They are what’s called a limited hangout
Exploring controlled opposition is click bait? This guy is a gate keeper who exposes some of the truth but not all. I was hoping to have a conversation but I guess not.
Often times the discussion that comes from a post is more valuable than the post itself. I discussed the concept of a limited hangout in my other comment, as well as other conspiracy type psyops designed to make you think outside the box and still not know what’s going on. There is only so much that I can fit within the title of a video.
You, on the other hand, have added zero value to this discussion. If you want to talk crap about a post, why not go to the hundreds of big articles spammed by the popular posters on this forum that sit around all day and post here.
^ Gee ... I wonder who downvoted my comment ... hmm ... quite the mystery.
KEK
Dude, if you can't respond to criticism in a contructive manner, you are doomed in life.
If you think about it, this is exactly why the extreme leftists are so hostile and unhinged. They cannot respond to any cricism with anything other than pure emotional outburst, and it is quite pathetic to witness.
Have you ever considered that I have other shit going on and cannot respond right away? God forbid I made a mistake when formatting this post.
Dude, if you can't respond to criticism in a contructive manner, you are doomed in life.
“Low effort clickbait post” is not constructive criticism. You complain about immaturity but came out against my post in a way that was in no way mature. I admit that I should’ve formatted my post better and that it deserves constructive criticism. You’re comment was more of an insult than constructive criticism.
I admit that I should’ve formatted my post better and that it deserves constructive criticism. You’re comment was more of an insult than constructive criticism.
Yes, it was an insult. The constructive part came later, after I got your attention.
Glad you see the problem that I see.
This board has a lot of good stuff posted on it, but a lot of lazy participants, too.
Another example is the Depp vs Heard shit. The theorists are claiming Depp has bot farms to spam shit against amber heard. Both are deep staters but this is obviously something used to demoralize young men. If this rich guy Depp can’t defend himself against an abusive woman, what can I do?
Russell brand and the “Gop is plotting to steal the election and kill us all” narrative are examples of conspiracy theories/theorists that have become even more popular. They say enough to get people talking but not enough to reveal the real truth. They are what’s called a limited hangout
Low effort click bait post.
Exploring controlled opposition is click bait? This guy is a gate keeper who exposes some of the truth but not all. I was hoping to have a conversation but I guess not.
I didn't mention anything about anyone in the video.
I specifically addressed YOUR low effort in creating this thread with a click bait and nothing more.
If you want to discuss something of substance, you should start by stating something of substance yourself, so there is something to discuss.
Often times the discussion that comes from a post is more valuable than the post itself. I discussed the concept of a limited hangout in my other comment, as well as other conspiracy type psyops designed to make you think outside the box and still not know what’s going on. There is only so much that I can fit within the title of a video.
You, on the other hand, have added zero value to this discussion. If you want to talk crap about a post, why not go to the hundreds of big articles spammed by the popular posters on this forum that sit around all day and post here.
That's my point. A title is not for the purpose of stating an argument.
The TITLE is for the purpose of stating what the general topic is.
That box under the title is for YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENT to start the disucssion.
Otherwise, it is just clickbait.
That's because it was not my intention to add to a discussion that does not exist.
YOU, as the OP, have the responsibility to START the discussion with YOUR thoughts on it, and not to simply rely on what SOMEONE ELSE said in a video.
Your actions are just lazy.
This board is infected with this type of laziness, and I am simply pointing it out.
I agree with you, btw, on all the hundreds of other posters here who do the same thing.
But that does not mean it is a good way to have a discussion.
It's basic courtesy -- something our modern society has lost along the way. Either you learn it, or you do not.
^ Gee ... I wonder who downvoted my comment ... hmm ... quite the mystery.
KEK
Dude, if you can't respond to criticism in a contructive manner, you are doomed in life.
If you think about it, this is exactly why the extreme leftists are so hostile and unhinged. They cannot respond to any cricism with anything other than pure emotional outburst, and it is quite pathetic to witness.
Have you ever considered that I have other shit going on and cannot respond right away? God forbid I made a mistake when formatting this post.
“Low effort clickbait post” is not constructive criticism. You complain about immaturity but came out against my post in a way that was in no way mature. I admit that I should’ve formatted my post better and that it deserves constructive criticism. You’re comment was more of an insult than constructive criticism.
Yes, it was an insult. The constructive part came later, after I got your attention.
Glad you see the problem that I see.
This board has a lot of good stuff posted on it, but a lot of lazy participants, too.