Durham limited in presenting evidence that collusion claims were untrue, judge says
(www.msn.com)
🚔 Crime & Corruption 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
If you post fake news link you have to atleast add your analysis.
From the first paragraph:
So what I am guessing is that if the defense concedes that they were lying, then Durham cannot introduce a lot of evidence to prove the same point.
Fake news link?
Which part of the Washington Examiner article is fake news?
Fren, you posted a link to MSN.
Sure did. Same article no matter the link.
Just a rule of thumb. Whenever you post a direct link to any MSM news just add your analysis, or else post a better link. MSM is called fake news for a reason. It doesnt mean they lie outright, but they lie by omission, out of context, and a million other ways that we have learnt over the past two years.
Even if a particular article is the epitome of journalistic standards, it still useless to people here since no one will take a word from it at face value.