So I was hanging out with a friend who is a centrist but seems to lean left, he knows I am conservative, but I don't go to deep into politics with him, just that I don't trust the establishment of either party. He knows I am unjabbed and never wore a mask.
Anyway, he brings up the jab. Said he went to get an MRI in his neck area. The tech asked him if he was jabbed, then asked when, he told the tech mar/apr, don't know the date, the tech pressed for a date, he didn't remember.
I was thinking this was leading to a booster question. But, not even close. He questioned the tech about why it mattered. The tech said the vaccine is showing up in MRIs, inflammation and showing past the blood brain barrier. My friend was shocked.
He is not getting boosted, hope he doesn't have complications from his initial doses, but glad he is waking up. He started questioning masks and said anyone that still wears one is suspect. He also questioned why they are still pushing the vax even though it does nothing for omicron. He says the majority of people he knows got omicron with the vax and without and all had similar symptoms.
People are waking up in stages. Waking up doesn't have to mean become fully awake. Waking up can be simply questioning things for the first time. Glad to see it happening, it gives me hope.
I'm not sure how insulting me helps you make an argument but you do you.
I also don't understand how anything you said refutes my claim that they made a best effort at these vaccines. If they believed they did a good job and the vaccine is effective, which many studies show that it is, why wouldn't they push for children to be vaccinated just like adults? You say it's been proven ineffective, but I can show you plenty of studies that show it is effective. I'm just looking for some actual citations or links to backup your argument.
If you'd rather just toss insults back and forth, then I guess I've won.
you seem to be avoiding my question. Why push an experimental vax, without long term testing on children for a virus that poses them very little risk?
The belief that they were helping prevent something worse? They were probably wrong but couldn't it just be that they were very worried about severe cases in children that just never materialized?
Lol, your mental gymnastics is astonishing.
if you really wanted citations you would read the countless posts on this board with citatiins and studies. Nobody is going to spoon feed an obvious troll. It is a waste of time.
You keep getting your boosters I will continue living healthy and free from this concotion you seem to love so much.