449 () Ya don't say? posted 2 years ago by CounterStrike 2 years ago by CounterStrike +449 / -0 64 comments share 64 comments share save hide report block hide replies
This could trigger years of litigation from advertisers sueing Twitter for overcharging on advertising fees by mispresenting the views.
Kind of a DS way to stick it to a new owner in this situation.
If the deal falls through then backroom "deals" will make this a non issue but if Elon ends up owning it, they'll go after him for their money back.