I saw a premier of "2000 Mules" on 5/2 with a dozen people in my local patriot posse. Despite D'Souza having great intentions, the man is simply a lousy film-maker. I've seen all his movies and none of them have impressed me. "2000 Mules" is no different, despite hoping for a better movie this time around since it was such compelling subject matter.
Sadly, I give this film an "EPIC fail" rating. And at $20 per ticket, nobody on earth is going to see it besides die-hard Trump supporters who already know that the 2020 election was stolen. The vast majority of this film is people sitting around talking to one another - not showing the DATA and EVIDENCE (which was SUPPOSED to be the entire point of the movie).
There's precious little evidence shown in the whole movie beyond what's already revealed in the teaser trailers. Some of the ballot-stuffer mule video footage even looked like 're-enactments' because of the numerous camera angles and edits - instead of legit footage (and it's not even spelled out that it's a re-enactment - which hurts the credibility of the real footage shown). Very, very disappointed - although not at all surprised.
After the movie, our dozen patriots hung out in the lobby and discussed the movie. All of us were in complete agreement that this movie is a colossal missed opportunity. And even worse, with so much hype about it, expectations are likely even higher - and it doesn't deliver. At all. IMO, save your money.
I question the authenticity of the above post. It sounds like he is trying to persuade people not to view it in the hopes of a flop and not lending credibility to the voter fraud. I could be wrong. $20 per person is a lot at the theater. It is completely sold out in Cleveland, Ohio suburbs. You can wait until next week, gather neighbors and friends and pay $20 to watch at home.
Someone asked me for my credentials to discern whether or not a scene in the movie was a re-enactment vs. legit video footage from a street camera. That is the reason I spelled out my "credentials" on the subject. Here is that exchange:
Dernoddle 5 points 1 day ago +11 / -6 You say "footage even looked like 're-enactments'" and then charge that they did not spell it out that they were re-enactments. Do you have proof that there were re-enactments, or is this just your opinion?