wasn't one of the steps of the military taking over deploying the National Guard to areas because of civil unrest?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
If white hates intentionally create chaos where rioters and looters burn, steal, and kill, just so they can come in with the military, then I would not consider them white hats. That is exactly what black hats would do though. The white hats would be doing everything to prevent that and keep the law and order. The whole deal around "military is the only way" I can see only applies to where good average citizens learn of the corruption and the military is needed to keep law and order and arrest all the crooks otherwise the average joe is gunna take justice into their own hands.
You are right. Some of the theories circulating out there about what white hats may or may not be doing would imply just what you suggest, in that their actions, if true, would be no better than those they claim to be fighting against. What would be the difference between the two? Q stated that things have to be done right. Any suggestion to the contrary makes the white hats no different. Never interfere with an enemy in the process of destroying themselves.
Any violence will most likely occur in leftist areas where governors will refuse to call in the National Guard - just like a couple of years ago under Trump. The military cannot just simply intervene because there is unrest unless they are requested to be there.