I just want to get a reading on this controversial subject of abortion. Who here (like me) supports pro-choice for the simple fact that they believe in body autonamy when it comes to vaccines and masks? No government should have the right to tell you and me what to put in our body or put on our body. PERIOD. These mandates are unconstitutional against our civil and human rights to be free Americans, they're trying to erode that right now. But in the same breath, no government should have the right to tell women what they can't take out of their body. PERIOD.
The moment the baby detaches from the body is when the baby is their own person, as long as the baby is attached to the person, that person decides what happens because it is THEIR BODY. Is that not reasonable? Everyone here agree that government should stay the fuck out of our lives? I hope so. If not then that's your choice I guess if you want to be a government simp.
I think there's an major difference between the pro- life/choice issue and the decision to vaccinate or mask yourself, enough so that they're unrelated and have no business being presented as similar arguments. You can disagree, of course, but this is my opinion.
Pro- live/choice issue: I consider your argument unreasonable. We are discussing a life (the baby) sustained-yet-separate from the mother. Both the mother and the baby have individual rights, no matter how far along that baby is in the development process, inside or outside of the body. The mother is integral to this conversation, yes, but the life of the baby is sacred and termination of a baby should only be in consideration in very rare circumstances, such as if the life (not the quality of life) of the mother is in question.
To argue that a baby who is detached from the mother's body is their own person is spurious, in that you need to define what "their own person" means. In terms of mental development and dependency, a baby can be argued "not their own person" until they reach legal adulthood. A coma patient can be argued not "their own person" because they show no brain activity, but we don't arbitrarily abort/unplug them because of it. As this becomes an argument of legal minutiae, I would avoid this kind of argument, OP.
Vaccination or masking issue: No other life is included other than the sovereignty of the individual who is masking or receiving vaccination upon their own volition. The individual should have the choice whether or not to undertake the medical procedure without coercion.
To both ends, in any case, these issues should be worked out by the States.