Getting off the Roe V Wade train for a while (since it's been beat to death all day), I happened upon a random article proclaiming Japan to be a "Trumpian paradise" because of their immigration policies. For those of you that don't know, Japan has one of the strictest immigration policies in the world. It's essentially impossible to immigrate to Japan if you're not Japanese or an American who was raised on an American military base in Japan. The article goes on to explain how these policies are causing Japan's population to rapidly decrease over time since their birth rates are below replacement level.
Now you may be asking, how does this not happen to other nations with similar birth rates, like the USA for example? Well, most other nations allow immigration, thus as long as your nation is attractive for people to live financially, you'll have a steady stream of immigrants ready to go join your population. Keep in mind, this doesn't mean that all of these people are always aiming for, or will be granted citizenship.
Australia is a good example of that. Ignoring the cabal muslim invasion of Australia, Australia is actually rather strict on actual immigrants as well. They only allow a certain amount a year, and the requirements change on annually based on what job sectors are lacking man power. So one year you might have doctors being given preferential treatment in the immigration offices, and the year after it might be miners, etc. etc. And there's always a limit on the number of people admitted so only the best applicants are entertained.
In both cases, most people will start out as a permanent resident, meaning they're permanently residing in the nation, but they're not a citizen thereof and have limited rights (Like the lack of a right to vote for example). Most of the time, they'll just stay that way the rest of their lives. If they value citizenship, then they'll finish going through the process to become citizens.
Now with all the boring explanation out of the way, let's get back to Japan. The article I found talked about how by 2060, Japan will finally have a stabilized population of 90-100 Million. Meaning their population will finally have achieved equilibrium with their birth rates. It would more or less stay in that 90-100 Million range unless some outside factor resulted in a large change in their birth rates for the foreseeable future (the article said 2100).
The article also talked about the possibility of using government policies to incentivize marriage and having a family among young people. In this model, Japan will continue to contract for another decade, before expanding at moderate, but extremely stable rate resulting in a population of 140-150 Million by 2060. This actually seems to be what Japan is currently testing the waters with, given their absolute loathing of the idea of allowing immigrants access to Japan.
So now my actual question, what do you guys think will happen with the US, Canada, Australia, UK, Germany, France, etc. when all this is over? Are we going to see population expansions because of a second "baby boomer" generation, ala WW II? Will we continue with the current model, but just with stricter laws and regulations so as to maintain a controlled expansion like how it's supposed to technically work in Australia? Or will we see mass population contractions like Japan is currently experiencing because we all cut off the stream of immigrants post-globalization? Or perhaps the model Japan is currently testing will prove to be the ideal model for all of us, and we'll experience a few decades of contraction before achieving a stabilized growth pattern through nothing but natural growth?
Or perhaps a hybrid model where we allow for strict and limited immigration, while also incentivizing family units in order to achieve a stabilized birth rate. Ergo, avoiding the contraction phase altogether by initially allowing for more immigration, while gradually weaning ourselves to the bare minimum?
Not the most exciting topic, I know. But it do find that it's an important discussion for the post cabal world that's rapidly coming to fruition.
Looking at technological progress over that time horizon likely a lot more automation of everything and robots etc which Japan is leader in that field. So likely they are doing right thing as far as restricting immigration and keeping Japan as Japan. For western nations the damage has been done of too much immigration and not sure what will happen but Balkanization is likely outcome. But on other tech fronts, cloning and artificial wombs may be wild cards.
Also radical life extension tech that would also be wild card and change population dynamics and have far reaching effects.
I don't entirely agree, mainly on the balkanization and there being irreversible damage done to the west part. Balkanization is the exact opposite of what we want and what "The Plan" has an end goal. Besides, the UK is already setting a precedent by deporting "refugees" and immigrants to Rwanda en masse, including people who were born in the UK to "refugees" and immigrants. Likewise people always seem to forget Trump's off handed remarks about retroactively revoking citizenship of illegals, "refugees" and their descendants, and performing mass deportations. Remember, Trump never says anything without there being a reason behind it.
Likewise, cloning is just wrong on so many levels. Like, cabal levels of wrong. So I don't accept that as a solution to population growth. I personally believe that Automation won't be anywhere near as prevalent as people seem to believe. It's more economically prudent to introduce "human work force" incentives in order to coerce companies to adopt human leaning hybrid models. If all the menial low paying jobs and basic labor jobs are outsourced to robots, then you have a VERY large portion of the global population that will be jobless due to having skills and talents that are no longer required. Which of course leads to Universal Basic Income, which leads to socialism, which leads to communism, which is EXACTLY what we're trying to avoid and defeat. It would be stupid to not adopt more advanced and efficient technology, but we also have to account for the human factors in everything and how it would impact the workforce and economy overall.
Think of a CNC machine shop. Everything done in such an outfit used to be done by hand, by a few dozen people over the course of many months. Now with modern technology, you can have those same dozen people do what used to be several years worth of work over the course of a week. This allows for a company to scale up their business model by hiring even more people to run the machines, that are increasingly more efficient and advanced, in order to meet ever growing demand bolstered by steady population growth (regardless of the means used to achieve said growth).
Personally, I find the hybrid model to be the most realistic for the west. Mass deportations of the illegals and "refugees" will cause a moderately large population contraction over a short period of time. And then our newly patriotic governments will enact positive family unit oriented policies, which when combined with the new found economic prosperity and religious revival we're experiencing (or will experience in regards to the economic prosperity) will drive birth rates up in order to achieve a steady population growth.
Combine that with limited immigration based on merit and need, and I find this to be the most reasonable and realistic outcome/solution for the west.
Yes I wasn’t saying cloning was right or wrong (I think it morally wrong) just seeing the trend and possible reaction to it. It may not be implemented in west for moral implications but other non west countries like Japan might as it might not be seen as wrong to them.
As far as immigration a moratorium should be done for at least one generation or about 25 years. This is to have current immigrants assimilate otherwise Balkanization seems to be the trend.