Found on /pol/. Looked it up myself. Something isn't adding up with this draft being leaked (taken from PW, our larger Q board)
(media.patriots.win)
🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (110)
sorted by:
Titles are used to hook a reader into reading something, well that’s what I learned in school anyways.
I dont know how old your device is, but on mine I can open picture up just by simply clicking it before opening post and going into thread. There is a camera icon to let user know its a pic post.
The title was perfect, pic was interdasting, and went to comment section where OP posted a pic of the command line prompt demonstrating that this could be verified. The title was perfect because high effort was used to create a quality post.
1 word titles with no substance usually get scrolled past. I click on the thumbnails, but a title that gives a rough idea of the contents or poses a question are what get me to click if the picture isn't enough (or won't load).
Obviously not trying to be hard on you, just want to let you know how I look at it.
This post was posted approximately 30 minutes after original post, so not like it took hours to find it. It even uses same pic which even as a thumbnail would have clued them in that someone posted.
Mods have said to look at board first to prevent duplicate posts so they should lead by example.
Sorry, title of this post expects one to simply trust “looked it up myself” but there is no evidence. This is almost as bad as msm using “sources said.”
The other OP actually looked it up and presented a screen pic.
I am thinking for myself, and think this post also demonstrates that the mod just wanted to sticky their own post no matter what someone else posted even if another person had a higher quality and was advised of it which was me.
I delete posts if there is duplicates of it already. Feel free to search my post history if you like.
Cheers.