Here is an interesting take on who leaked the Roe v Wade draft document at SCOTUS, written by Michael Master:
Who Leaked the Document? May 5, 2022 *by Michael Charles Master (author of Trump the Disrupter at amazon.com) * The bad guys have us focused on the wrong stuff about the Supreme Court leaked document concerning Roe v Wade. As usual, Democrats and mainstream media are diverting attention away from the real issues that concern SCOTUS about Roe v Wade. They are trying to convince America that it is not important who leaked the document.
If you listened to Kamala Harris or Don Lemon or Rachel Maddow or many other Democrats and their mainstream media defenders, then you would hear this:
*1. congratulations and thank you to the person who leaked the Supreme Court document.
- that document shows that conservatives are going to take away a woman's right to choose (an abortion or not) and eventually take away any and all control that women have about their reproductive rights. *
Let's discuss both of those items.
The person who leaked the document is not a hero. That person is a traitor to the Supreme Court and to the United States of America. What documents like this one have ever been leaked in the past? None. Why? because it is not a final document for the public. It is a "classified" document for SCOTUS use only.... just like the documents on the Hillary Clinton private server. By leaking a classified document, that leaker broke the law, just as if any other classified document was leaked from any other department. If this leak is OK, then what will be leaked next? our classified military strategies? our classified energy reserve tallies? classified president phone conversations (oh yeah, that was already leaked)?
This is the important question: So who leaked the document? It had to be someone who had access to that document which includes the 9 justices and their clerks. No one else.
Would a clerk leak it? No. A clerk is just starting a legal career with one of the most important jobs available to a new lawyer in all of the USA. What 25 year old clerk would risk a promising legal career by leaking such a document? What clerk would risk the chance of becoming a Supreme Court Justice in the future by leaking that document now? No clerk!! Not one!!! Not for all the tea in China!!! Not without approval from the justice.
So my guess is that one of those 9 justices leaked it. Or had a clerk leak it. Which one? Sotomayer, Kagan, Jackson? They were losing the Roe argument, so one of them did what liberal socialists do... one of them leaked the document to try to stop the ruling.... which is much worse than anything done by Trump to try to stop the Jan 6 election certification.
Which justice did it? We may never know who leaked it as SCOTUS protects itself. But my bet is that all 9 know who leaked it. All 9 know who broke their rules, broke the law, and broke the trust that Americans have in SCOTUS.
The leak is an impeachable offense, an impeachment that all 9 will try to keep from happening. Their justification for protecting the leaker will be trying to protect the reputation of SCOTUS. But make no mistake, that justice who leaked it needs to be impeached. The end does not justify the means!!!
As far as what this case is about: the case is not about a woman's rights. That is just what Democrats want us to believe. This case is about the Constitution. Did SCOTUS with its original Roe v Wade decision in 1973 answer 2 important items:
-
what in the Constitution gave SCOTUS authority to use "privacy" in its 1973 ruling?
-
what in the Constitution allowed SCOTUS to ignore the 10th Amendment in its 1973 ruling?
Let's assume for a moment that this current court finds that Roe v Wade was incorrect.... that privacy and states' rights were not answered. Then what? That would not make abortion illegal as Democrats/liberals/mainstream media claim. It would only mean that the authority to regulate abortions would reside with each individual state. That is all. But that is exactly what Democrats fight against. They want a strong centralized federal government, and not a confederation of states as the Constitution created with the 10th Amendment.
So why are those Democrats/liberals/mainstream media twisting the truth about this case? Why was the document leaked? To cause an uprising by pro-choice women and non-Christian liberals. Democrats are in a deep hole concerning the 2022 midterm elections and they are using cultural issues like this one to try to dig out of that hole. To which, one of the Supreme Court justices was complicit at helping Democrats... guilty... guilty of putting politics ahead of America and our Constitution.
Like everything done by the Left there are unintended consequences. Leaking this makes it less likely the ruling will be reversed. The five Justices will be hounded either way by the Left and if one changes their vote they will be reviled by conservatives too.
The “leak” might not be aimed at getting SCOTUS to reverse the ruling. Its purpose was to give the Dems an emotional sledgehammer to end the filibuster and ram their agenda through before the midterm. That seems to be failing.
Chief Justice Robert’s appears to be using the leak as a pressure relief valve so to speak. By admitting it is the actual ruling there will be a period of protests, possibly tempered by the hope they can bully SCOTUS to change the ruling. But when it stands it will be clear to many they were always powerless to stop it and it will leave them exhausted.
In a way, this might well be another taste of the reality Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.
Interesting... thanks.
A bit of a Thomas Beckett affair if it were a Justice..... but given the democrats history of selling easy access to information especially at those levels..... indeed what we know about Pakistan intelligence being inside these hallowed halls or at least in the system..... means it really could have come from a number sources on their behalf or on behalf of others.....
At this stage we would serve our time better seeking out the Why? rather than the Who?.... indeed the closer you can get to Why? The more We narrow down the Who?.....
It’s about taking what we know already and stepping back and looking at the consequences/implications short or medium term......by focusing on the Who? we have a tendency to focus in on the issue and not the see what’s going on around it.... it’s a great shill method of manipulation or rather misdirection as well as a very easy trap for any of us to fall into, but I guess that’s why shills use it and unfortunately succeed in some cases....
WWG1WGA
i am still not sure why thy have their panties all twisted...all this will do is send it back to the states where it should be in the first place...just shows you how off the tracks the libs truly are...pochontas needs her old ass kicked all the way back to the reservation...the lib shithole in Mass will have their abortion anyway...
Exactly. The states are where such issues need to be resolved. And it doesn't matter if Massachusetts and California have their laws, and Tennessee and Texas have THEIR laws....that is how the Founders wanted it. The libs are just screaming about their fantasy "worst-case" fears. I'm old enough to remember America BEFORE Roe v. Wade, and abortions were illegal just about everywhere... but they were still performed, just secretly and most often safely.
Repeal 19th.
Hehehe.... brother, you're opening another can of worms right there. Not touching that one.
Expecting the HEAT rounds any time now.
We'll see. Might go over the heads of the Oppo, who thinks abortion is in the Constitution.
Do you really think all of those clerks are there simply for merit? Many of the clerks are a pawn/insider of powerful political organizations (meaning vast legal connections) with many carrots at their disposal. I am not saying the premise of this post is completely wrong, but to assume that no clerk in the SCOTUS environ is impervious to the ‘system’ is, perhaps, naive.
I suspect you are spot on.
I belive the leak was white hat supervised. The libs are mad as hell. Isn’t riling up the left Trump’s speciality? When they are angry they make mistakes.
WTAF is this about? And what does it have to do with the SCOTUS link? 'Splain.