The goal of the psyop she leads is to make it appear that two things cannot be true at the same time. Her con is to make people believe that Tyler Robinson being the shooter and the existence of a larger conspiracy are mutually exclusive.
It is the equivalent of turning into the path of a torpedo before it can arm itself. Her mode of operation is to make a series of conspiracy claims her handlers know will easily be knocked down in court. Each revelation of her being wrong will result in most people shifting toward accepting Tyler Robinson actually did it; and, therefore concluding, there was no conspiracy.
Maybe the actual trial will prove me wrong, but I think the case against Tyler Robinson will be easily proven. It will lead most people to the conclusion he was a strange, gay, lone wolf. No one will pursue the possibility he was radicalized and manipulated into doing it. If that is what happens, the psyop was a success.
What’s interesting about this case is how many people seem to believe Tyler Robinson being the shooter and Charlie’s assassination being a larger conspiracy are somehow mutually exclusive. We know people are manipulated into committing assassinations and mass shootings. Why is the narrative being pushed that there was a larger conspiracy which precludes Robinson from being the shooter?
Maybe the real psyop here is getting people to expend so much time and energy fighting over whether Tyler Robinson did it, they fail to look for the people who radicalized him. And, when the evidence and testimony pile up during the jury trial people will be forced to admit he did and subconsciously conclude there was no conspiracy. Meanwhile the people who manipulated him to act move on without consequences.
My personal policy is to take what any influencer says with the tiniest grain of salt. They all have to sensationalize to make their living.
It seems to me the most important part of the case against Tyler Robinson is that he believes he shot and killed Charlie Kirk. Reporting from MSM outlets cover his conversations with his gay boyfriend and family. His text with Lance Twiggs and the note he left under the keyboard are totally damning. And, apparently, he confessed to his parents and a family friend as well.
It’s good to be skeptical about influencers and the MSM. It’s necessary to sift through what they report. Just my opinion, but his boyfriend’s testimony, their text message, and note are probably enough to get a jury past reasonable doubt.
This was already public knowledge. I remember reading the contents of this letter a couple months ago when the “influencer” crowd was rolling out their ever changing theories about Tyler Robinson. My prediction is worst case scenario, when this moves from preliminary hearings to an actual trial, the Judge might not allow this letter to be used as evidence. It won’t matter.
Apparently Robinson confessed to family members and friends who are willing to testify against him. And, it seems there is enough other evidence to support a conviction. Add in his body language and facial expressions, he will have a hard time getting any sympathy from the jury.
Hopefully, what he will remember about this year is that we were liberated and our nation was returned to its founding form. And, his memory will be based on the stories his family tells him and in a future class where our children are taught to take pride in their country.
A side note, I spent several weeks at Aberdeen Proving Ground in a joint training course that was based there. It was during the Reagan Era build up. I was in the Air Force, we were housed in an old barracks that had been vacant for years. We were upstairs and a group of Marines were downstairs. All good people who made good memories for me.
If a civilian is working on behalf of an enemy government to inflict damage on the United States, aren’t they considered an unlawful enemy combatant? This was a topic Lindsey Graham shined a light on during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.
I have thought for a long time that President Trump is supported by a team who has access to a powerful war gaming platform. I also believe that is the primary reason we were told we are watching a movie. Their ability to predict what different people will do is so accurate that each move and countermove feels scripted.
So, to avoid cognitive dissonance, I think he knew how Barrett would turn out. Maybe the rulings where she sided with conservatives were worth it? Like overturning Roe v. Wade. Maybe there is more going on behind the scenes than even we imagine?
The one interesting thing about the recent questionable and disappointing SCOTUS rulings is they seem to be packaged with instructions on how to work around current laws. It also seems Kavanaugh plays a role in writing those instructions. We’ve seen this in the tariffs case, the Nationalizing the National Guard case, and now the Birthright Citizenship Case.
Spot on!
This statement from the article was a very convoluted way to say just that, but make it sound benign:
It. . . was also documented in groups with strict hierarchies in which it could build alliances and avoid aggression within the group.
The common sense interpretation of that statement is the dominant males and females sexually forced themselves on same sex group members as a way to enforce the pecking order. So, it really isn’t about sex, it’s about dominance.
I can’t help, but wonder if there are comms here about liberating Cuba?
President Trump might not lead an actual, physical charge up a Cuban hill, but he has been leading a charge against a more formidable opponent than the Spanish were in 1898. And, he’s been leading the charge for over a decade now. Based on his actions and rhetoric regarding Cuba, it is definitely part of the larger plan.
POTUS posted this earlier, it details a Plan B on banning Birthright Citizenship. I’m curious if the SCOTUS ruling contains language that leaves the door open for an Act of Congress to change the parameters for birthright citizenship?
When it comes to the SCOTUS, I’m always prepared to be disappointed. The context of why the 14th Amendment was written should be enough, but Barrett and Roberts are prone to convenient interpretations. It isn’t hard to imagine them saying the Amendment doesn’t specifically say former African slaves.
I hoped the Administration team would have dug in deeper on the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” instead of accepting the standard definition. I believe it means much more than just being governed by the laws of the United States, or owing allegiance to it. The African descended slaves were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in a way no other class of people were.
They were seen as subjects with limited or no individual rights, or worse, they were legally considered subhuman, and classified as chattel property. Foreign nationals who entered the United States, legally, or illegally had more rights than an African descended slave.
Anyway, no reason to re-litigate this, just needed to vent about the lack of common sense, and courage in the American Judicial Branch.
I know several people who live in France and it is uncharacteristically hot there. As u/Munchaussen/ says most homes are not air conditioned so triple digits make for a pretty uncomfortable day.
Having said that, it’s certainly not the first time they’ve had a heatwave. I was stationed in Europe in the 80’s and spent several days in Paris one summer. It was easily in the upper 90’s the whole time I was there. So, if there is anything fake going on here it is acting like a heatwave in France is something new and a valid reason to deprive someone from having a cool beer
Window air conditioners and dehumidifiers top my list. They used to work for decades, now it’s like they are designed to die within three years. They claim to be more energy efficient, but if you add in the energy to manufacture them, the energy they consume running at suboptimal levels, and whatever energy is consumed scrapping them, there is no way they’re more efficient.
Himmlischer Vater, bitte segne unseren Freund mit Deiner Gnade und Deiner heilenden Kraft. Amen
Anmerkung: Mein Deutsch ist ziemlich eingerostet, daher habe ich eine Übersetzungs-App verwendet. Ich hoffe, dass der Sinn der Botschaft in der Übersetzung erhalten geblieben ist.
Maybe Switzerland is a total decoy and the talks are being conducted elsewhere. These are very sensitive negotiations with a large number of groups who would dearly love to sabotage them. It would be a security nightmare to hold these talks in a location known to the world.
Part of me says don’t waste your time and part of me says we do have to engage with these people. So, I would answer their question with a question/statement and it would be:
The only way I can answer that question is if you explain to me what you believe we already had?
If you try to answer them, without understanding their frame of reference, they have a wide open field to refute every point you make. If you know their frame of reference, then you have the ability to tick off what’s different and they can only debate on the basis of what they defined.
Honest question, wouldn’t that mean Kash Patel, Blanche, Bondi, and quite possibly President Trump are participating in the coverup? Or, just as bad, someone has the skill and ability to outmaneuver President Trump, our DOJ, FBI, and Intelligence Agencies?
Either way, it doesn’t bode well for the Q Movement, MAGA, and the future of our country.