Our present pronoun chaos started with Femininnies nagging weak men into using "he or she" instead of the traditional default pronoun for indeterminate gender, which was "he." Ayn Rand even used that and made fun of "he or she," which she only put into a Statist document.
Compromising emasculatees found that "he or she" was too clumsy. Instead of standing up to the penis-envy piranhas, the weaklings were shamed into using the plural "they" instead, even though its antecedent is in the singular. At least they could have put that in the plural, e.g., changing the intentionally brain-damaging "If a lawyer does this, they get that" to "If lawyers do this, they get that."
In fact, media girlymen are obviously required to go out of their way to put all antecedents in the singular, so they can further dumb the public down by pairing them with "they." Everybody who uses this grammatical monstrosity, and almost everybody does in these weakling times, is under the spell of these screeching, castrating banshees.
This proves that women are not our mental equals, because they'd rather use a complete contradiction of number than a possibly indeterminate gender (not so, "he" originally only meant "this person"). This is real-life Orwellian "NewSpeak," unlike that in "1984," which is too stupid ("doubleplus ungood") to ever be accepted, even in our contemporary Age of the Sheep, which fake manliness thinks is the Age of the Ram.
Eggheads Get Hen-Pecked
Our present pronoun chaos started with Femininnies nagging weak men into using "he or she" instead of the traditional default pronoun for indeterminate gender, which was "he." Ayn Rand even used that and made fun of "he or she," which she only put into a Statist document.
Compromising emasculatees found that "he or she" was too clumsy. Instead of standing up to the penis-envy piranhas, the weaklings were shamed into using the plural "they" instead, even though its antecedent is in the singular. At least they could have put that in the plural, e.g., changing the intentionally brain-damaging "If a lawyer does this, they get that" to "If lawyers do this, they get that."
In fact, media girlymen are obviously required to go out of their way to put all antecedents in the singular, so they can further dumb the public down by pairing them with "they." Everybody who uses this grammatical monstrosity, and almost everybody does in these weakling times, is under the spell of these screeching, castrating banshees.
This proves that women are not our mental equals, because they'd rather use a complete contradiction of number than a possibly indeterminate gender (not so, "he" originally only meant "this person"). This is real-life Orwellian "NewSpeak," unlike that in "1984," which is too stupid ("doubleplus ungood") to ever be accepted, even in our contemporary Age of the Sheep, which fake manliness thinks is the Age of the Ram.
You sound like a modern Diogenes.
I can't find this article anywhere.
EDIT: Never mind, found it. It was you, elsewhere.