Before 2000 Mules, there was the 2021 Cyber Symposium held by Mike Lyndell and so much more. Please post anything im missing in the comments!
From off the top of my head, over the years we have now up to this point:
• Witnessed how they use the vote tabulation systems to miscount and change votes through adjudicating. Remember: one county in Georgia adjudicated something like 50,000 votes (need sourcing). Meaning, "we made up some excuse to say that these ballets were miscounted and cant be recounted, so we changed 50,000 to make up for the correction."
• Witnessed how they leave electronic voting machines vulnerable to outside influences. Remember: all it takes is the thermostat in the room to have a wifi signal for someone to gain access.
• Witnessed boxes of ballots coming out from under the table after everyone else was evacuated from the premises.
• Witnessed ballots being paid for with pocket change in Milwaukee
• Had whistleblowers come out saying communities take ballots from Retirement homes, from places where people barely read or speak english.
Now with 2000 mules, which also goes over some of the things listed above, we have a much greater showcase of how the Big Steal was done.
They had a network of mules, for days on end, obtaining ballots to be taken to a nonprofit. They would then fill in ballots with information of unlikely (people who moved or havent voted in years), or unable voters (dead, or mentally incapable voters). Then mules would pick up those now filled in ballots and deliver them to Soros and Zuckerburg paid for drop boxes. When that STILL WASNT ENOUGH, they then resorted to having election laws changed (so late as the day of the election itself) outside of the proper protocol. This allowed them to continue the mule operation above, while also using fake ballots shipped in from overseas to really pump those numbers. All the while, they were even changing votes with their extended voting time, leaving the machines open to hacking as well. They adjudicated whatever they could, used fake and stolen ballots to stuff the boxes, and even let outside forces tinker however they please. All of this, while using a bioweapon (that may not even be real, mind you) as an excuse to propagandize, slander, and censor to foment a state of mass psychosis to even allow the above to EVEN HAPPEN. REMEMBER THAT: WITHOUT COVID, NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE. No covid = no mail in voting. (As if they could have gotten away with doing this with only absentee ballots; its how Trump won in 2016. Plus the trump train wouldnt have stopped like it was FORCED TO once Covid hit. But I digress.)
This was debunked within a day or two of going viral. I can't imagine you haven't seen or read about it. Did you just choose to ignore it and stick what you wanted to be true?
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/georgia-election-officials-show-frame-by-frame-what-really-happened-fulton-surveillance-video/T5M3PYIBYFHFFOD3CIB2ULDVDE/
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/12/video-doesnt-show-suitcases-of-illegal-ballots-in-georgia/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/12/14/fact-check-georgia-suitcase-video-missing-context/3892640001/
There was no debunking. You didn't watch the video. Ballots were pulled out from under a table and counted multiple times by people that stayed behind.
You are a fool if you still believe the safest election BS
So you're just choosing to ignore the facts I just provided with that debunks this claim? In addition to the fact that Ruby Freeman sued for slander and won, which wouldn't be the case if what you want to have happened actually happened.
I don't buy the theory that the 2020 election was the most secure in history. You might but there is evidence that shows otherwise. I don't have all of the info and I'm sure I have some of the details wrong but That's what discussion is for.
Feel bad for you buddy. Perhaps your energy is better spent elsewhere.
Why do you feel bad for me? Because I can be objective about the truth rather than letting my emotions shape my chosen "facts" to fit my own personal narrative? Never feel bad for someone who for having an honest perspective.
Why is that? Am I not welcome here because I don't share your beliefs about this particular incident? What happened to all that free thinking, discernment and denouncing of sheep and hive minds? It's EXTREMELY telling that at the very first sign that I'm not fully in lockstep with 100% of YOUR beliefs that you immediately suggest I remove myself from this community and its discourse. This is the exact behavior patriots claim to despise, so it's shocking to see someone who identifies as one so quickly embrace that mindset.
I was speaking more to the general anger and overall unpleasant attitude as you have decided to put yourself in a place where you agree with no one and attack the individual rather than discuss the item in question. You are more than welcome to do so but it just seems strange. Anyway, good luck!