This is the real deal,this actually goes into how the medical trials are essentialy marketing campaigns. I read through the book illusion of evidence based medicine and it laid out how in the past they used techniques to misrepresent trials. I knew they would have evolved to further be able to misrepresent stats but i wasnt smart enough or clued up enough in medical research papers to understand or figure out how, i knew they would be doing it to come out with ridiculous efficacy numbers figures like they did and suspected they were doing similar to what they had in the past but so many people caught onto that that i figured they must have new ways of lying. This stuff is exactly what i've been looking for, this is the kind of stuff that you can use to utterly shut down "intellectuals".
What disgusts me most is at university we had a module on detecting bias in research papers. It was the most surface level dogshit you can imagine. No mention of how pharma actually works nor how you actually dig deep to find real bias. I have never been more disappointed in people when these supposed lecturers which encouraged us to question pre covid all of a sudden wanted me to shut up when it actually came to putting that into practice when there was a real serious case of malpractice and fraud infront of our very eyes, the same people that lectured us on medical ethics were silent when mask mandates came about and encouraged students to be vaccinated, even facilitated a mobile vaccination center to the university. The whole thing is a shit show.
Thanks for posting this anon ive been waiting for something like this!
This is the real deal,this actually goes into how the medical trials are essentialy marketing campaigns. I read through the book illusion of evidence based medicine and it laid out how in the past they used techniques to misrepresent trials. I knew they would have evolved to further be able to misrepresent stats but i wasnt smart enough or clued up enough in medical research papers to understand or figure out how, i knew they would be doing it to come out with ridiculous efficacy numbers figures like they did and suspected they were doing similar to what they had in the past but so many people caught onto that that i figured they must have new ways of lying. This stuff is exactly what i've been looking for, this is the kind of stuff that you can use to utterly shut down "intellectuals".
What disgusts me most is at university we had a module on detecting bias in research papers. It was the most surface level dogshit you can imagine. No mention of how pharma actually works nor how you actually dig deep to find real bias. I have never been more disappointed in people when these supposed lecturers which encouraged us to question pre covid all of a sudden wanted me to shut up when it actually came to putting that into practice when there was a real serious case of malpractice and fraud infront of our very eyes, the same people that lectured us on medical ethics were silent when mask mandates came about and encouraged students to be vaccinated, even facilitated a mobile vaccination center to the university. The whole thing is a shit show.
Thanks for posting this anon ive been waiting for something like this!
Glad to help!