In a previous post, I had predicted Elon’s Twitter acquisition would be followed by a due diligence, and that would reveal inflated numbers related to fake users. I had further predicted that would lead to SEC’s involvement on financial crimes, and, as government influence is unveiled, 1st and 4th Amendment violations and electoral meddling.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HbuAtvuK/prediction-elon-will-get-a-disco/
He just put the deal on hold waiting for discovery:
“Elon Musk has said his $44bn (£35bn) deal to buy Twitter is on hold after he queried the number of fake or spam accounts on the social media platform.”
https://www.yahoo.com/now/elon-musk-puts-twitter-deal-100226605.html
Next: what happens when Twitter investors learn they’ve been fooled by management?
Yes.
Apr 09, 2018 <= Q 1105
+4 years
Apr 09, 2022 <= Elon rejects the board seat
https://m.economictimes.com/tech/technology/timeline-how-elon-musks-twitter-takeover-unfolded/articleshow/91100011.cms
Very interesting. If Musk was Deep State, I wonder if part of the condition of his getting strings cut, which probably came with all of the DOD/USG contracts his companies receive, would be to use his wealth to implode Twitter from within.
What if an audit shows 15% of Twitter's users are bots. Not only does it have political implications, but shareholder implications. An audit showing inflated user base could seriously crash the stock down to a 1:1 revenue to market value at about $5B. Shareholders at all levels could easily sue and win. Maybe DWAC comes in and buys the pieces when it's all said and done.
One could think inflated numbers are not a Twitter exclusive, but also at Google, Facebook, both DARPA projects (FB = DARPA Lifelog). Inflated user/usage numbers would be the perfect cover up for government money funding people surveillance, censorship of “wrong” opinions, and meddling elections, under the veneer of “private companies”.
DARPA Lifelog shutdown on Feb 4th 2004 (https://www.wired.com/2004/02/pentagon-kills-lifelog-project/)
Facebook founded on Feb 4th 2004 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook)
I wouldn't be surprised if the USG has direct technical processing type hooks into all of the tech of these companies they funded as part of the "initial investment" whether through In-Q-Tel, shadow VCs, or born in a DARPA lab. If you ever watched the TV series Person of Interest, I can tell you for a fact everything on that show is 100% real, technically speaking. To what extent the USG is deploying it, I don't know.
Then there is HAMR/HAMMER - that's an entire other convo. Word is Comey helped facilitate the sale of it to the CHICOMs.