You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (195)
sorted by:
▲
2
▼
–
deleted
2 points
ago
+2 / -0
▲
1
▼
–
NOT_ADMIN
1 point
ago
+1 / -0
- When objective data is not enough, then you make no determination. You don't assume. Logic means nothing, logic can be flawed logic. What the logic is based on is what matters. The logic base needs to be on empirical data if we are going to deal in factual reality.
- I agree that, through the means of data, we have been able to prove in a variety of means that the election was stolen.
- The military likely has good people, I struggle to go past what I have observed, the military may know it was stolen and I hope they do. but I don't know if they do or not since that's not a data point I have seen. I can assume but assuming is not something I enjoy doing for arguments. it's a slippery slope.
- Maybe they handed power or maybe they did not. I don't know. I still don't really see the leap from, the military would hand over the keys, to Biden being removed all the way back before the education and replaced with a clone, or an actor who had to have so much surgery that they removed all of their old wrinkles and replaced them with Bidens but forgot to attach the earlobes?
- I also don't see why that would be more likely of a scenario than they are controlling the real Biden because they have dirt on him, or they have a way to hurt/kill/expose him at any time.
permalink
parent
save
report
block
reply
▲
1
▼
–
deleted
1 point
ago
+1 / -0