Durham trial
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/07/judge-spares-clinton-camp-in-sussmann-ruling-00030887
Believing anything from Politico was your first mistake.
Heres the 24 page ruling.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.121.0.pdf
The judge denied the conspiracy claim made by durhams team.
No where in that order does the judge deny the conspiracy claims. It is stated that, because Sussman is not being charged with conspiracy that they would not allow certain articles of conspiracy to be brought forth during Sussman's trial. No where in that order has the judge said that the case at hand cannot be tied to Hillary or her campaign.
III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that [58] Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony or Evidence Pertaining to Former FBI Assistant Director Bill Priestap’s and Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson’s Notes is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that [59] Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Case if the Special Counsel Does Not Immunize Rodney Joffe is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that [61] Special Counsel’s Motion in Limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED that [57] Defendant’s Motion to Preclude the Special Counsel from Presenting Evidence or Argument Regarding Matters Subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained on the record on April 27, 2022. SO ORDERED.