Yes it was on the first pages of the book where it stated: :
1. Fantasy — Fiction. 2. Witches — Fiction. 3. Wizards — Fiction.
4. Schools — Fiction. 5. England — Fiction.
Now back to the point, you made a claim someone is not real and a book is fictional, without any evidence for that, and when asked refused to support the burden of proof requested. You have further made a claim of what happened a long time ago, asserted in fact, but no one can verify. While you have made further specific claims, nothing you have said yet has proven your initial claim that someone is not real and a book is fiction. Unfortunately i have to say it looks like you have no satisfactory evidence to support your initial claim, and so it can therefore be dismissed.
Insulting at this point cements that you have no evidence to support your initial claims, demonstrates bad form on your part, and signals anything further will be a waste of time (possibly tantrum-like). Best to leave it here, i've been at all levels of debate below this one, and nothing positive comes from it. But if you can get satisfactory evidence to support your initial claims i'll revisit.
As noted the waste of time has begun, and the tantrum has begun with the assertion an insult isn't an insult.
You can continue being incivil but it will result in a ban. Or present clear satisfactory evidence to support your initial claim (this is a research board). Or leave it here, and let your silence signal agreement that your unsupported claim can be dismissed.
Yes it was on the first pages of the book where it stated: : 1. Fantasy — Fiction. 2. Witches — Fiction. 3. Wizards — Fiction. 4. Schools — Fiction. 5. England — Fiction.
Now back to the point, you made a claim someone is not real and a book is fictional, without any evidence for that, and when asked refused to support the burden of proof requested. You have further made a claim of what happened a long time ago, asserted in fact, but no one can verify. While you have made further specific claims, nothing you have said yet has proven your initial claim that someone is not real and a book is fiction. Unfortunately i have to say it looks like you have no satisfactory evidence to support your initial claim, and so it can therefore be dismissed.
I'm afraid you're retarded
Insulting at this point cements that you have no evidence to support your initial claims, demonstrates bad form on your part, and signals anything further will be a waste of time (possibly tantrum-like). Best to leave it here, i've been at all levels of debate below this one, and nothing positive comes from it. But if you can get satisfactory evidence to support your initial claims i'll revisit.
I've already proved ya wrong retard 😉
Also, it's not an insult, it's objectively true. I'm sorry you're easily offended!
As noted the waste of time has begun, and the tantrum has begun with the assertion an insult isn't an insult.
You can continue being incivil but it will result in a ban. Or present clear satisfactory evidence to support your initial claim (this is a research board). Or leave it here, and let your silence signal agreement that your unsupported claim can be dismissed.