Duh, Mr. Handshake, I asked why she used "Jews" instead of "people." Someone could have answered why other people shouldn't drink human blood either. It seems it would be important to clarify when there is so much theorizing about drinking blood for adrenocrome. So we go to Leviticus because the whole point is to bring up a rehash of the blood libel, which is directed at Jews specifically. At least it's a step forward from all Jews sacrificing a child for Passover to only a few who worship Moloch. If you want to argue logic, you are only pointing out that a distinction was made between "Jews" and "people."
Duh, Mr. Handshake, I asked why she used "Jews" instead of "people." Someone could have answered why other people shouldn't drink human blood either. It seems it would be important to clarify when there is so much theorizing about drinking blood for adrenocrome. So we go to Leviticus because the whole point is to bring up a rehash of the blood libel, which is directed at Jews specifically. At least it's a step forward from all Jews sacrificing a child for Passover to only a few who worship Moloch. If you want to argue logic, you are only pointing out that a distinction was made between "Jews" and "people."