In rebuke to Pentagon, Navy board finds 3-0 for vax objector amid questions of mandate's lawfulness. In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon, a Navy administrative separation board voted unanimously to retain an officer who refused to comply with the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. - The Great Awakening

In rebuke to Pentagon, Navy board finds 3-0 for vax objector amid questions of mandate's lawfulness. In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon, a Navy administrative separation board voted unanimously to retain an officer who refused to comply with the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. (justthenews.com) ⚠️ Vax-WINNING 👌

posted 2 years ago by purkiss80 2 years ago by purkiss80 +370 / -0

24 comments

24 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (24)

sorted by:

▲ 13 ▼

– Hope70 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Here is a true Patriot. I pray that the upper brass will not seek retribution upon him. He stood up for himself and other military members by calling out this unlawful demand of injecting a EUA shot, which is NOT A VACCINE, does not provide any efficacy, but provides many long term side effects, weakening of the immune system and death. None of this is in the best interests of our brave military members or our nation. But as we suspect, those at the top, i.e. the DOD and military, are evil, treasonous scum who deserve military tribunals and then the firing squad or hanging until dead.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Hand_Of_Node 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

No, he's toast. Plus, he's a willing tool of globalhomo.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q