Bacteria are real and you can easily see them. They have pictures and different descriptions.
Though as far as Im aware. No one has ever shown bacteria to cause disease. They show up to clear away dead tissue, but we kill the bacteria so guess what those symptoms usually come back and lots of times people end up with longer term problems
Then the original promoters of viral existence were wrong or where they part of the conspiracy? Certainly peers that were also detractors would have dinged their work when reviewing. Kind of like a celebrity faking their death…. How much does it cost to maintain this secret? FWIW I understand there is much corruption in medicine and science, however not all of it.
I'm of the mind that you are right, but most of that is suspicion. I've seen some good evidence, but I'm not sure enough yet. Thanks for the links.
Remember you dont need evidence to prove viruses arnt real. You need to be proven that they are
Is bacteria fake too? Are you saying that any virus does not exist?
Bacteria are real and you can easily see them. They have pictures and different descriptions.
Though as far as Im aware. No one has ever shown bacteria to cause disease. They show up to clear away dead tissue, but we kill the bacteria so guess what those symptoms usually come back and lots of times people end up with longer term problems
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/the-origins-of-viruses-14398218/#
So no virus exists....but bacteria exist...yet do not cause people to get sick?
correct?
Then the original promoters of viral existence were wrong or where they part of the conspiracy? Certainly peers that were also detractors would have dinged their work when reviewing. Kind of like a celebrity faking their death…. How much does it cost to maintain this secret? FWIW I understand there is much corruption in medicine and science, however not all of it.
Well dont you know the origin story of germ theory. Pasteur theorized viruses exist. Couldnt find them so just said they are too small lol.
But did he have access to todays lab equipment? No. So was his theory ever disproven? Because, if yes, we wouldn’t be having this discussion.
Right, but what I mean is reasons to change my mind. I've seen enough REASONS to believe it's possible.