If Q was not a lie, and was actually a perfectly-honed plan contained by absolute secrecy, then yes, I can't disprove that.
I also can’t disprove the possibility that Bernie Sanders was a Trump fan and with perfect secrecy and planning ran in the 2016 election solely to ensure Trump’s victory. I can’t disprove every piece of evidence to the contrary as being “optics” or “disinformation.”
There are countless unlikely possibilities that COULD be true if the stars aligned.
My problem with the Q theories has nothing to do with whether they're possible.
It has to do with whether or not they can actually be disproven.
Trump fucking up the SCOTUS picks doesn't mean he's not a strategic genius. It just means he's running a sting.
The Lindell symposium being... less than earthshattering doesn't mean he was a fraud. It means that the symposium was designed to freak out the Deep State and make them "expend ammo."
The AZ audit falling flat doesn't mean that the Plan has failed. It means that this was always necessary to prove the incompetence of the courts.
If every failure has a reason and every piece of evidence against you is fabricated by an All Powerful Enemy, then I can't possibly disprove Q. At all. Period.
If they can't be disproven, and it turns out Q is a lie, then you have absolutely no way of figuring that out. Because it's a theory that can't be disproven.
And that would worry me. I don't like being tied to non-falsifiable beliefs, because if I am wrong, there is no way for me to ever discover that using evidence. Such a belief is sustained by faith, and can only be lost through faithlessness.
If they can't be disproven, and it turns out Q is a lie, then you have absolutely no way of figuring that out. Because it's a theory that can't be disproven.
Oh,if it will be disproven it will be... and you will know. We all will be knowing,and this will ABSOLUTELY not be funny at all...
Read the rest of previous post. Too many "coincidences".
Unlike most anons I accept the possibility that Q is a trap set by those who Q "exposed". And in such case we are in deepest shit possible.
Moreover Q claims would definitely expire in 2025. (Q3387).
And about 3387 : datestamp scares me black hats can be really in control like those date.
Oh,if it will be disproven it will be... and you will know. We all will be,and this will ABSOLUTELY not be funny at all...
How would you know when Q has been disproven?
Who could tell you that you'd believe? What loser nobody could be exposed as Q that you'd believe? What great failure could occur that could NOT be considered "optics" or "look weak when you're strong"?
What exactly would the signal be? Who would have to tell you that it was time to give it up?
Is there anybody? Is there any such signal?
So when you say that the Q community will know if they've been lied to... I don't know how. I imagine that everyone has their own personal deadline for Q, and as time marches on, people will hit those deadlines.
Some people had deadlines back on election day, and on Dec 14th, and on Jan 6th, and on Jan 20th, and so forth. Some people have deadlines in the future. Some people don't know their deadlines and will just "know it when they see it", I guess.
But at the end of the day, even if Q is 100% a lie, I don't expect any "great awakening" for Q people. More likely than not, by 2025, if the Plan hasn't occurred, I imagine the Q community will have lost the people it's going to lose one at a time over years, and the rest will transition to some new movement in the same spirit as this one.
But, that's falsifiable. We'll see what happens by 2025.
You clearly still have problem with reading with understanding whole text.
Yes, point of falsification is probably end of 2025 according to Q post 3387.
Some people had deadlines back on election day, and on Dec 14th, and on Jan 6th, and on Jan 20th, and so forth. Some people have deadlines in the future. Some people don't know their deadlines and will just "know it when they see it", I guess.
Of course,but those I mentioned looks like kind of objective deadline...
The problem is there is not "back to normal" Q true or false.
and the rest will transition to some new movement in the same spirit as this one.
Or there would be other kind of "transition" - to the atmosphere for us before...
Because that's the problem with plausible deniability - you normies see almost nothing like we see - 2 "alternative realities"...
"prophecy":
If white hats are not in the control or will still allow black hats to do their job soon monkeypox may be claimed as attacking not only homosexuals because of "mutation"
You remember wuhan crisis begining aren't you ? I suspect this situation is 3:1 at least. Hope I am wrong.
If Q was not a lie, and was actually a perfectly-honed plan contained by absolute secrecy, then yes, I can't disprove that.
I also can’t disprove the possibility that Bernie Sanders was a Trump fan and with perfect secrecy and planning ran in the 2016 election solely to ensure Trump’s victory. I can’t disprove every piece of evidence to the contrary as being “optics” or “disinformation.”
There are countless unlikely possibilities that COULD be true if the stars aligned.
My problem with the Q theories has nothing to do with whether they're possible.
It has to do with whether or not they can actually be disproven.
Trump fucking up the SCOTUS picks doesn't mean he's not a strategic genius. It just means he's running a sting.
The Lindell symposium being... less than earthshattering doesn't mean he was a fraud. It means that the symposium was designed to freak out the Deep State and make them "expend ammo."
The AZ audit falling flat doesn't mean that the Plan has failed. It means that this was always necessary to prove the incompetence of the courts.
If every failure has a reason and every piece of evidence against you is fabricated by an All Powerful Enemy, then I can't possibly disprove Q. At all. Period.
If they can't be disproven, and it turns out Q is a lie, then you have absolutely no way of figuring that out. Because it's a theory that can't be disproven.
And that would worry me. I don't like being tied to non-falsifiable beliefs, because if I am wrong, there is no way for me to ever discover that using evidence. Such a belief is sustained by faith, and can only be lost through faithlessness.
Oh,if it will be disproven it will be... and you will know. We all will be knowing,and this will ABSOLUTELY not be funny at all...
Read the rest of previous post. Too many "coincidences".
Unlike most anons I accept the possibility that Q is a trap set by those who Q "exposed". And in such case we are in deepest shit possible.
Moreover Q claims would definitely expire in 2025. (Q3387).
And about 3387 : datestamp scares me black hats can be really in control like those date.
How would you know when Q has been disproven?
Who could tell you that you'd believe? What loser nobody could be exposed as Q that you'd believe? What great failure could occur that could NOT be considered "optics" or "look weak when you're strong"?
What exactly would the signal be? Who would have to tell you that it was time to give it up?
Is there anybody? Is there any such signal?
So when you say that the Q community will know if they've been lied to... I don't know how. I imagine that everyone has their own personal deadline for Q, and as time marches on, people will hit those deadlines.
Some people had deadlines back on election day, and on Dec 14th, and on Jan 6th, and on Jan 20th, and so forth. Some people have deadlines in the future. Some people don't know their deadlines and will just "know it when they see it", I guess.
But at the end of the day, even if Q is 100% a lie, I don't expect any "great awakening" for Q people. More likely than not, by 2025, if the Plan hasn't occurred, I imagine the Q community will have lost the people it's going to lose one at a time over years, and the rest will transition to some new movement in the same spirit as this one.
But, that's falsifiable. We'll see what happens by 2025.
You clearly still have problem with reading with understanding whole text.
Yes, point of falsification is probably end of 2025 according to Q post 3387.
Of course,but those I mentioned looks like kind of objective deadline...
The problem is there is not "back to normal" Q true or false.
Or there would be other kind of "transition" - to the atmosphere for us before...
Because that's the problem with plausible deniability - you normies see almost nothing like we see - 2 "alternative realities"...
"prophecy":
If white hats are not in the control or will still allow black hats to do their job soon monkeypox may be claimed as attacking not only homosexuals because of "mutation"
You remember wuhan crisis begining aren't you ? I suspect this situation is 3:1 at least. Hope I am wrong.