The shooter was taken into custody?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You’re obviously a shill/ mason just like cats5 or whatever. Why no real research gets done here.
Your right. The lefty loves to "assume" what someone would do in a situation when convient but suddenly switch to the old "i try not to assume how people react in these situations". They had no problem assuming in the previous comment..
Notice how it then reacts by not addressing the flip flopping on assuming. Only attempts misdirection through emotion, shock, and exaggerations. Id have to say what we are seeing is your typical type b shill. Nothing to fear, its an old model. Havent seen one of these babies out on the frontline in a couple years. (Slaps hood) These shootings really bring em out of hiding..
That's a fair point, in a sense. But I think it's just a semantic thing. Here:
I assume that people under extreme stress (such as being in a gunfight or facing the possibility that your child was murdered) may behave in ways that seem irrational.
They will not always do the things you think you would do under those circumstances, because the brain does weird stuff when subjected to survival pressures.
A woman I did martial arts with was a black belt, and an excellent fighter. She was raped largely without a fight, because her brain shut down from the shock. She could have killed her attacker with her bare hands, but you never know how you're going to react under that kind of pressure until you're in it.
So, essentially, I try not to do Monday Morning Quarterbacking on what a "reasonable" person would have done under circumstances that could potentially make ANYONE unreasonable.