It began with Lenny Pozner suing Jim Fetzer for his book "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook". The book was immediately removed from almost all booksellers beginning with Amazon. Fetzer was found guilty and given a $75,000 fine. Fetzer then offered it as a free download.
When Leonard (Lenny) Pozner and others brought this lawsuit everyone I listened to was speaking truth of Sandy Hook. Here was their best opportunity to begin the censorship we see now. Infowars was the first. Sandy Hook truth was scrubbed from the internet quickly followed by 9/11 Truth. Before this went to trial.
Infowars was huge at the forefront and was needed to be made an example of.
They had to control public opinion and the popular narrative....as we see now.
Maybe just me, but with everything I've seen in that case against Jones looked to me like he didn't really WANT to win the case.
He was making arguments that had no bearing, didn't mention stuff that seemed pertinent.
iirc, there is a specific bar for defamation, something like malicious intent, and the fact is that the kids dad fake crying looked fake as shit when he was smiling and jovial seconds before.
I also believe he was used to scare people away from looking in the Sandy Hoax. He's entertaining and does speak a lot of truth, but he is the definition of controlled opposition.
It began with Lenny Pozner suing Jim Fetzer for his book "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook". The book was immediately removed from almost all booksellers beginning with Amazon. Fetzer was found guilty and given a $75,000 fine. Fetzer then offered it as a free download.
When Leonard (Lenny) Pozner and others brought this lawsuit everyone I listened to was speaking truth of Sandy Hook. Here was their best opportunity to begin the censorship we see now. Infowars was the first. Sandy Hook truth was scrubbed from the internet quickly followed by 9/11 Truth. Before this went to trial.
Infowars was huge at the forefront and was needed to be made an example of. They had to control public opinion and the popular narrative....as we see now.
Maybe just me, but with everything I've seen in that case against Jones looked to me like he didn't really WANT to win the case.
He was making arguments that had no bearing, didn't mention stuff that seemed pertinent.
iirc, there is a specific bar for defamation, something like malicious intent, and the fact is that the kids dad fake crying looked fake as shit when he was smiling and jovial seconds before.
I also believe he was used to scare people away from looking in the Sandy Hoax. He's entertaining and does speak a lot of truth, but he is the definition of controlled opposition.