An “AR” is most likely a .233/5.56 caliber. Essentially a “22”. Most ammo is not expanding, and the round is fast. All that adds up to some little holes through a person, if a bone is not hit.
I saw a linkN yesterday, an LE walking out of the hospital that had been hit with 3 rounds; face, abdomen, and hand, a few days earlier. Black officer in Idaho.
I don't know call Rittenhouse shot an AR-15 and it did some pretty devastating damage. I know if I shoot you with an AR-10 it's going to put a basketball sized hole in your chest if I'm using fragilating rounds at normal self-defense range. If I hit you in the leg with that you'll be lucky if you still have a leg afterwards. I mean in close quarters or especially indoors you're going to want something like a pistol caliber carbine because of the more polite muzzle flash and the quieter bang and the lighter recoil. I mean I wouldn't use a rifle to do anything indoors unless it had a really really good suppressor on it.
You say ar-10 you mean when it fires 7.62 it is a bigger hole than ar-15 with smaller ammunition but ar-15 can fire 7.62 so i don't understand how ar-10 can blow bpeople's leg off but ar-15 just makes little holes. Please explain
.223 at self defense ranges will still inflict some devastating injuries on someone. I never said that it wouldn't. I think you might be confusing 223 with those little 22 plinking rounds for like squirrels and shit. It's not necessarily entirely about the size of the bullet it's about how much energy it dumps into the target when it hits.
I think it actually is the size of the gun firing the bullets. He was saying that a big gun hits harder than smol gun. So the gun is what makes the energy dump into the target, he said.
An “AR” is most likely a .233/5.56 caliber. Essentially a “22”. Most ammo is not expanding, and the round is fast. All that adds up to some little holes through a person, if a bone is not hit.
I saw a linkN yesterday, an LE walking out of the hospital that had been hit with 3 rounds; face, abdomen, and hand, a few days earlier. Black officer in Idaho.
I don't know call Rittenhouse shot an AR-15 and it did some pretty devastating damage. I know if I shoot you with an AR-10 it's going to put a basketball sized hole in your chest if I'm using fragilating rounds at normal self-defense range. If I hit you in the leg with that you'll be lucky if you still have a leg afterwards. I mean in close quarters or especially indoors you're going to want something like a pistol caliber carbine because of the more polite muzzle flash and the quieter bang and the lighter recoil. I mean I wouldn't use a rifle to do anything indoors unless it had a really really good suppressor on it.
You say ar-10 you mean when it fires 7.62 it is a bigger hole than ar-15 with smaller ammunition but ar-15 can fire 7.62 so i don't understand how ar-10 can blow bpeople's leg off but ar-15 just makes little holes. Please explain
there's a billion youtube videos about this subject, look up hydrostatic shock .
so the same bullet out of an ar-10 is more powerful than out of ar-15? id didn't see this on the billion video list
.223 at self defense ranges will still inflict some devastating injuries on someone. I never said that it wouldn't. I think you might be confusing 223 with those little 22 plinking rounds for like squirrels and shit. It's not necessarily entirely about the size of the bullet it's about how much energy it dumps into the target when it hits.
I think it actually is the size of the gun firing the bullets. He was saying that a big gun hits harder than smol gun. So the gun is what makes the energy dump into the target, he said.