It's not easy, but it will happen over time. The NWO folks have thrown us into fuel, water, food, electricity, etc... shortages.
The closer we all are to self-sufficiency, the better. If you can't produce it yourself trade with your neighbor, if they don't have it, try the next neighborhood...
I predict this will happen. I feel there will be a de-federalization and in that process self-reliance becomes more economical and reliable for homes and businesses.
One big issue with so-called renewables is the amount of land they take up. You can do your own calculations but I selected one solar plant and found its actual yearly output then compared it with that of a (once) coal-fired power station in the UK.
Replacing that one power station would take up at least 180 square miles assuming that in the UK we had access to as much sunlight as the Nevada desert! In practice that area would need to be multiplied by a factor - and the solar plant still used gas to get it warmed up in the morning. That factor could be quite large so we could be talking of a thousand square miles per power station!
That may be an option in big countries like Russia, Canada and the USA but how will places like the UK and Japan cope?
Multiple solutions on small scale. A turbine cylinder style wind fan if your property is in a windy place, not a huge windmill that kills birds, solar, turbine in the creek behind your house. Hydraulic plates in roads and driveway.
Ice and snow reflect solar radiation quite well, water absorbs it. Solar farms would work as well as ice or snow in dealing with some solar radiation.
The difference between temperature on the surface and under ground can be exploited.
For the UK it looks as if wind will be a better bet than solar. Wind power has already overtaken coal power. Electricity from gas is the largest sector. Wind works for the UK because of its large availability of sea which overcomes some of the land use issues. It does make the electricity more expensive, though.
If you opt for small units, say one per property, then you get other issues. Assume the UK population is 80 million with 20 million homes and round that up to a convenient 25 million total properties requiring electricity then, further assuming a 25 year lifespan, that will mean replacing 1 million turbines every year on average - or around 3000 every day for ever.
IMO --- it's not that easy.
Although the Amish have vehicles that run on grass and water.
It's not easy, but it will happen over time. The NWO folks have thrown us into fuel, water, food, electricity, etc... shortages.
The closer we all are to self-sufficiency, the better. If you can't produce it yourself trade with your neighbor, if they don't have it, try the next neighborhood...
This is all a conflict between theory and reality.
IMO Globalization will not solve the perceived problems.
Globalization IS the problem.
I don't like big anything, becomes bloated, inefficient, and corrupt.
I predict this will happen. I feel there will be a de-federalization and in that process self-reliance becomes more economical and reliable for homes and businesses.
ANYTHING big becomes corrupt Charity, Religion, Government, Science, Business, etc...
One big issue with so-called renewables is the amount of land they take up. You can do your own calculations but I selected one solar plant and found its actual yearly output then compared it with that of a (once) coal-fired power station in the UK.
Replacing that one power station would take up at least 180 square miles assuming that in the UK we had access to as much sunlight as the Nevada desert! In practice that area would need to be multiplied by a factor - and the solar plant still used gas to get it warmed up in the morning. That factor could be quite large so we could be talking of a thousand square miles per power station!
That may be an option in big countries like Russia, Canada and the USA but how will places like the UK and Japan cope?
Multiple solutions on small scale. A turbine cylinder style wind fan if your property is in a windy place, not a huge windmill that kills birds, solar, turbine in the creek behind your house. Hydraulic plates in roads and driveway.
Ice and snow reflect solar radiation quite well, water absorbs it. Solar farms would work as well as ice or snow in dealing with some solar radiation.
The difference between temperature on the surface and under ground can be exploited.
For the UK it looks as if wind will be a better bet than solar. Wind power has already overtaken coal power. Electricity from gas is the largest sector. Wind works for the UK because of its large availability of sea which overcomes some of the land use issues. It does make the electricity more expensive, though.
If you opt for small units, say one per property, then you get other issues. Assume the UK population is 80 million with 20 million homes and round that up to a convenient 25 million total properties requiring electricity then, further assuming a 25 year lifespan, that will mean replacing 1 million turbines every year on average - or around 3000 every day for ever.
Then there are the batteries ...
What I was trying to convey is that each home have several power generation methods.
If the trillions of dollars the NWO were spent on research we would have better batteries.
Mechanical storage might be worth some research as well.