Define SSRI problem. Distinguish the levels of depression and how the mental health industry’s addiction to psychotropic drugs negates one’s right or the rights of family to self protection. Define violent criminal in a judicial system purporting that Jan 6 protestors are terrorists and sides with a political mindset that there is no inherent right to self defense. Any one of ‘us’ is one court decision away from being wrongfully persecuted into any of these categories. So yeah fuckwit, you are talking about me.
An SSRI problem as it relates to firearms would be where the patient is not responding well to the prescription, is on social media describing fantasies of shooting up schools, and is actively acquiring weapons to fulfill that mentally unstable plan. You would do nothing?
A local community should have a panel of trusted experts, not anti-gun activists, that are alerted when such conditions are imminent. In light of the violent posts, the person can be brought in for proper examination before something tragic happens.
I agree that a violent criminal cannot be defined by the Democrats, because to them anyone supporting Trump is a violent criminal.
I also agree that any solution created by Democrats will generally f*** everything up. That's why conservatives need to step in and get it done for greater safety in the community while supporting everyone's right to keep and bear arms.
Until the problem with our culture is corrected then no remedy will work. The whole notion of tolerance is another issue. Fifty years ago there were more guns per capita than today and guns were much more prolific. Back then the culture was vastly different than today and people did not tolerate the bullshit that passes today.
Do you have SSRI problems? Are you a violent criminal or a foreign terrorist? No? Then we're not talking about you.
Define SSRI problem. Distinguish the levels of depression and how the mental health industry’s addiction to psychotropic drugs negates one’s right or the rights of family to self protection. Define violent criminal in a judicial system purporting that Jan 6 protestors are terrorists and sides with a political mindset that there is no inherent right to self defense. Any one of ‘us’ is one court decision away from being wrongfully persecuted into any of these categories. So yeah fuckwit, you are talking about me.
An SSRI problem as it relates to firearms would be where the patient is not responding well to the prescription, is on social media describing fantasies of shooting up schools, and is actively acquiring weapons to fulfill that mentally unstable plan. You would do nothing?
A local community should have a panel of trusted experts, not anti-gun activists, that are alerted when such conditions are imminent. In light of the violent posts, the person can be brought in for proper examination before something tragic happens.
I agree that a violent criminal cannot be defined by the Democrats, because to them anyone supporting Trump is a violent criminal.
I also agree that any solution created by Democrats will generally f*** everything up. That's why conservatives need to step in and get it done for greater safety in the community while supporting everyone's right to keep and bear arms.
Until the problem with our culture is corrected then no remedy will work. The whole notion of tolerance is another issue. Fifty years ago there were more guns per capita than today and guns were much more prolific. Back then the culture was vastly different than today and people did not tolerate the bullshit that passes today.
I support a partial ban of SSRIs.
Democrats and RINOs currently on SSRIs can voluntarily give up their right to bear arms if they want to keep taking them.