I'm not happy at this outcome but it is true that the net is widening from this trial. More and more evidence is coming in. But we need something to happen soon. People are losing their patience. Lot's of "good news" with nothing really happening (thus far.)
All the documents (aka evidence) and testimony can now be used going forward.
Also, Durham (mostly) stopped the attorney client "privilege" regarding many documents. (This will carry forward.)
So, the upcoming cases are also going to add to this. AND this evidence from Sussman can be used in the upcoming cases.
I'm as pissed as anyone here, but not shocked by what happened. And in the end, if we are to change the D.C. System, we have to get it on record just how corrupt it is. Q said Sussman was a cooperating witness how many years ago?
That’s not how any of this works. Admissible evidence is admissible evidence, and privileged evidence is privileged evidence. In each case, the evidence existed as such (either admissible or privileged) before the trial and will continue to be so in the future. Of course, admissibility is dependent on the fact in the case. Regardless, your comment makes no sense from a legal perspective.
And from Brian Cates Telegram:
"If only one thing had been accomplished by the Sussmann trial [and Durham got a lot more than one thing on the court record that he can use going forward in other cases he's building]?
Getting THIS on the court record made it all worthwhile even if a DC jury nullified the evidence and let Sussmann walk on a solitary minor charge of lying to a federal official.
It's no secret Durham is preparing to prosecute a criminal conspiracy case involving dozens of people."
I'm not happy at this outcome but it is true that the net is widening from this trial. More and more evidence is coming in. But we need something to happen soon. People are losing their patience. Lot's of "good news" with nothing really happening (thus far.)
More and more evidence is coming in? Of what exactly? And I’m not sure the veracity of this “evidence” is meaningful (see, e.g., this verdict).
All the documents (aka evidence) and testimony can now be used going forward. Also, Durham (mostly) stopped the attorney client "privilege" regarding many documents. (This will carry forward.)
So, the upcoming cases are also going to add to this. AND this evidence from Sussman can be used in the upcoming cases.
I'm as pissed as anyone here, but not shocked by what happened. And in the end, if we are to change the D.C. System, we have to get it on record just how corrupt it is. Q said Sussman was a cooperating witness how many years ago?
That’s not how any of this works. Admissible evidence is admissible evidence, and privileged evidence is privileged evidence. In each case, the evidence existed as such (either admissible or privileged) before the trial and will continue to be so in the future. Of course, admissibility is dependent on the fact in the case. Regardless, your comment makes no sense from a legal perspective.
I was referencing something similar to this https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEJv3zZg/john-durhams-son-people-are-forg/c/ There has been talk on a few channels about this.
And from Brian Cates Telegram: "If only one thing had been accomplished by the Sussmann trial [and Durham got a lot more than one thing on the court record that he can use going forward in other cases he's building]?
Getting THIS on the court record made it all worthwhile even if a DC jury nullified the evidence and let Sussmann walk on a solitary minor charge of lying to a federal official.
It's no secret Durham is preparing to prosecute a criminal conspiracy case involving dozens of people."