Sussmann is a little fish. What is important is that evidence has been entered into a court of law which then can be used to catch the bigger fish. When additional trials occur, the evidence introduced will be used again, which will produce more evidence. The net is getting tighter, and the bigger fish will be trapped.
I get the reasoning from us supporters here on why/how he got off (e.g. bad jury), but still, seeing "a cooperating witness" get off, doesn't feel good in the short term.
This is going painfully slow and if something doesn't happen in the coming months, it is really going to look like we lost a battle. I get we are securing the coming elections but how much time do we have?
The thing that upsets me is that I feel we are being fooled as much as the deep state, LOL.
It was held in DC. Enemy territory. Durham did it for a reason.
I bet it crosses some T's or dots some necessary I's in the law of War / Devolution progression
Edited. I think it was an expected verdict for Sussman. The information already proven now will be able to be used in future cases which is what Durham was setting up
I bet the next trial will not be tried in the swamp.
Sussmann is a little fish. What is important is that evidence has been entered into a court of law which then can be used to catch the bigger fish. When additional trials occur, the evidence introduced will be used again, which will produce more evidence. The net is getting tighter, and the bigger fish will be trapped.
Verdict... Not guilty. Just now
I get the reasoning from us supporters here on why/how he got off (e.g. bad jury), but still, seeing "a cooperating witness" get off, doesn't feel good in the short term.
This is going painfully slow and if something doesn't happen in the coming months, it is really going to look like we lost a battle. I get we are securing the coming elections but how much time do we have?
The thing that upsets me is that I feel we are being fooled as much as the deep state, LOL.
I don't think we're being fooled.
It was held in DC. Enemy territory. Durham did it for a reason.
I bet it crosses some T's or dots some necessary I's in the law of War / Devolution progression
Edited. I think it was an expected verdict for Sussman. The information already proven now will be able to be used in future cases which is what Durham was setting up
I bet the next trial will not be tried in the swamp.
Well said,anon! ;-)