I don't understand why Dr. Blaylock is being called a whistleblower here. Yes, it is a bit strange the NIH posted his article but I don't see him as a "whistleblower"
We have been following Dr. Blaylock for years. He has a monthly newsletter that is usually about as long as this article and packed full of good and useful information.
Dr. Blaylock was the first doctor, to my knowledge, that explained why the masks are dangerous and only cause people to fear more and want to wear them more.
This is the best, most comprehensive article on covid that I have read.
I don't understand why Dr. Blaylock is being called a whistleblower here. Yes, it is a bit strange the NIH posted his article but I don't see him as a "whistleblower"
We have been following Dr. Blaylock for years. He has a monthly newsletter that is usually about as long as this article and packed full of good and useful information.
Dr. Blaylock was the first doctor, to my knowledge, that explained why the masks are dangerous and only cause people to fear more and want to wear them more.
This is the best, most comprehensive article on covid that I have read.