Revolvers take on Uvalde shooting
(www.revolver.news)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
i will say as a former LEO that if it was me or my partner in that situation we would have took the bastard out....i dont care what they said they could have fired me if i was still alive but that bastard would be all done....
Exactly!
have you ever been in a situation where you need to react that quick??there are many in the upper COC that are worthless..when you take that oath you know full well today may be the day you dont go home..there are many that forget that..if one child was saved it would be worth the risk. besides if you go in right he goes down and you are fine..these are decisions you make faster than most can imagine....
I speculate that this was a false flag meant to provide impetus for gun control legislation. That it was planned and not spontaneous, and that these cops were told to look cowardly and ineffectual and told not to enter the school by whoever was in control of this event. Maybe they really killed children, maybe they didn't. I don't know.
But the reason they planned to make the cops look useless was to stop people from suggesting that the answer to school shootings is to put police and more security officers in schools. They wanted the only solution to be gun control.
Seems obvious to me.
Doesn't it seem odd, that just as gun control legislation starts making its way through congress, we suddenly have shooting after shooting, all with the exact same weapon? The AR-15?
Your logic presupposes that cops being in schools would be effective in stopping school shootings. But also that these same cops, who were at a school, were told not to interfere and were okay with that. Why then do you think "cops in schools" is the battle line, if your enemy already controls the cops? If your enemy can make the cops ineffectual, why would you think cops in schools would be any benefit, if they can just be deactivated at any time?
Moreover, why would your enemy care about limiting your access to guns when they already own the supply - and the world's largest military, complete with enough drones to make a beehive jealous? Do you really think an AR-15 or any other commercially available gun will protect you if the US Government wants you dead (or more likely, just wants your property and really couldn't care less if you live or die)?
And if commercially available hardware WON'T protect you from the tyranny of government with access to modern military technology - then does your enemy actually want to limit your access to what is already commercially available? Or are you being distracted with arguments over different sizes and amounts of sticks while your enemy has all the swords? And if so, what are you being distracted FROM?
I'm not sure what your point is.
My point is that I believe it was a planned event, and they purposefully wanted to make the cops look completely ineffective to support the narrative that adding security to the schools is not effective; That the only solution is to have no guns available in the USA.
I agree with so much of this article but the actions of Uvalde police still don't make sense to me.
These children were part of their community. How do you sit back and let them die?
If I were a cop in Uvalde and found out that I had received the wrong information from dispatch and children were begging for help, I would quit right now. My anger, shame, and guilt would be off the charts. I would make it my business to find out the real truth. There is something very wrong here.
QUOTE: Americans of all backgrounds are depressed, horrified, humiliated, and ashamed to see to many innocent lives lost thanks to gross failure by those sworn to “serve and protect.” But Americans should not be surprised at this outcome. America has spent decades deliberately creating less capable, more cowardly police, and without a change of direction more tragedies like Uvalde will come to pass.
QUOTE: Scot Peterson, the worthless deputy who cowered outside during the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in 2018, is collecting more than $8,000 a month right now. The three police officers present at career criminal George Floyd’s overdose death who weren’t named Derek Chauvin will likely spend years in federal prison. END QUOTE
This is how upside down our political elites have made things. How these cops didnt risk their lives to save children is beyond me. It is in our basic nature to save the weak and helpless-especially children. The border patrol acted in the way all cops I know would have acted.
Even emergency personnel would have risked their lives to get in there and help the children.
There must be massive corruption and criminal activities going on behind the scenes.
The town knew the shooter was torturing and killing animals and he was a bully. Why were they all so submissive to this?
Just my thoughts
Blackmail? Think of how many cops seem to like kiddie porn. Collecting a pension and keeping your mouth shut beats the alternative of your browser history getting you locked up? Idk but fuck these jerks
Well, that does happen but all 19? (Thats the last count I read).
I care because every part of my being says something is very wrong here, more than what we are hearing. In this way it reminds me of the Las Vegas shooting- which news and main stream investigation lied and it took real investigation on the part of alternative media.
Right I'm just guessing. Maybe drug or illegal trafficking has all of them compromised idk
And it doesn't take many to make one guy NOT do the right thing
That's true
How long until attorneys for the shooter/ family sue the border patrol agents for interfering and killing their boy. That wasn't part of the deal!