Revolvers take on Uvalde shooting
(www.revolver.news)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Your logic presupposes that cops being in schools would be effective in stopping school shootings. But also that these same cops, who were at a school, were told not to interfere and were okay with that. Why then do you think "cops in schools" is the battle line, if your enemy already controls the cops? If your enemy can make the cops ineffectual, why would you think cops in schools would be any benefit, if they can just be deactivated at any time?
Moreover, why would your enemy care about limiting your access to guns when they already own the supply - and the world's largest military, complete with enough drones to make a beehive jealous? Do you really think an AR-15 or any other commercially available gun will protect you if the US Government wants you dead (or more likely, just wants your property and really couldn't care less if you live or die)?
And if commercially available hardware WON'T protect you from the tyranny of government with access to modern military technology - then does your enemy actually want to limit your access to what is already commercially available? Or are you being distracted with arguments over different sizes and amounts of sticks while your enemy has all the swords? And if so, what are you being distracted FROM?
I'm not sure what your point is.
My point is that I believe it was a planned event, and they purposefully wanted to make the cops look completely ineffective to support the narrative that adding security to the schools is not effective; That the only solution is to have no guns available in the USA.