Unconventional View:

They don't want you disarmed. They want you armed to the teeth with what are basically spitballs in comparison to weapons of modern war. If you believe in the concept of the uniparty, RINO's, globalism, etc., ask yourself a few questions. 1. If they want the people disarmed, why hasn't the uniparty, SC, etc. reinterpret the Constitution or pass new legislation? Why do RINO's always "save the day" when it comes to gun control legislation? All that's happened is FEAR of a ban that resulted in MOAR people panic buying. 2. What would justify, from a historical sense, an armed AI drone swarm or electronic warfare on a populace?

To be clear, I'm not opposed to the 2A or the idea that small arms are necessary for a free society. In fact, I think the 2A should be interpreted more liberally to include all weapons necessary for a militia to defend the country. But, I don't think the current interpretation/allowance of the 2A is sufficient. It's almost like they're applying enough pressure to get a strong enough push back before an effective rug pull if that makes sense.