Yes, I disagree with the law and the law disagrees with me. I'm talking about what I personally believe the law should be, not how the law is written right now.
Imagine saying that we have the right to own fully automatic weapons unrestricted per the second amendment and some retard says "lol, no, try having a fully automatic weapon and seeing if the police agree with you."
This isn't a friend coming over to visit your house
Yes, it's actually worse. I believe that a person's body is even more under their control than their property.
It is against nature to violently remove that child.
The number of times I've seen chickens peck at, destroy, and ultimately eat their own fertilized eggs tells me that you're wrong.
yada yada emotional effect
Look, I'm not advocating for abortion. But the argument that it will negatively effect the woman, while a very good reason to not get an abortion, is not an argument for why abortion should be criminal, because that only affects her. The only debate here is about how it affects the fetus, who is the second party in this equation. And I believe it is within the woman's right to murder it, if that is necessary to remove it.
Yes, I disagree with the law and the law disagrees with me. I'm talking about what I personally believe the law should be, not how the law is written right now.
Imagine saying that we have the right to own fully automatic weapons unrestricted per the second amendment and some retard says "lol, no, try having a fully automatic weapon and seeing if the police agree with you."
Yes, it's actually worse. I believe that a person's body is even more under their control than their property.
The number of times I've seen chickens peck at, destroy, and ultimately eat their own fertilized eggs tells me that you're wrong.
Look, I'm not advocating for abortion. But the argument that it will negatively effect the woman, while a very good reason to not get an abortion, is not an argument for why abortion should be criminal, because that only affects her. The only debate here is about how it affects the fetus, who is the second party in this equation. And I believe it is within the woman's right to murder it, if that is necessary to remove it.