Could that message from Q possibly be specifically referring military tribunals being the only way to convict them instead of it being a reference to the direction of leadership? The Sussman trial showed us exactly what will happen if we go the civilian route...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Ive always struggled with this drop. A few things to note, on various patriot sites and even going back to the heyday of VOAT pre 12/2020 there were posts by active duty and veterans alike all saying that there was no chance the US military was going to be involved in domestic operations or anything regarding the election up to and including martial law. Of interesting note are the text messages and emails between the Trump administration senior MIL where questions about seizing servers or voting machines was strongly rebuffed. (See the emails from joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley)
So this drop if credible must refer to someone else's military in a non domestic capacity. Maybe its NATO, maybe its Cuba for all we know, but my point is its vague if you don't just assume it means martial law or domestic arrests which based on the evidence it isn't
TLDR, if its not our military. its intentional misinformation or we have misinterpreted the meaning
u/#q114
I like it...BUT remember details are key. "US military = savior of mankind' is not the same as "military is the only way"
Q did not say "US military is the only way"
I could be reading into this too much, but Im trying make heads or tails over the military refusing to get involved even when Trump was CIC.