What if the real goal is to legally expose the players?
And to serve up data for tribunals for treason?
And prepare the public for military tribunals?
These people were all involved in a plot to overthrow the government, and a minor conviction isn't going to move anyone's needle relative to the crime.
Maybe just a dumb question, but I thought I'd ask to see if anyone else is having similar thoughts and questions.
Exactly. Two great tweets that explain so much.
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1531674888649547781
Durham did not push for the recusal of Judge Chris Cooper in Sussman case despite:
Cooper being professional friends with Sussmann
Cooper’s wife represented former FBI lawyer Lisa Page
Cooper and his wife were married by Merrick Garland (!!!)
Cooper appointed by Obama
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1531702621332963335
Sussman trial:
Judge's wife is Lisa Page's lawyer
One of the juror's kids is Sussman's kid's rowing teammate
Multiple jurors were Hillary supporters/donors
There was never going to be a conviction.
And durham knew it and didnt put up a stink
Good points - when those little tidbits were exposed, it was pretty clear the swamp was working overtime to protect itself. When Durham let those things slide - wait, what is he up to now?